#Login Register


  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
Home 


Solitary consumption: 31 percent of marijuana users prefer using alone
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
04-19-2017, 12:39 PM #1
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Quote:A majority of Americans think marijuana use is socially acceptable, a new Yahoo News/Marist Poll, “Weed & the American Family,” finds.

According to the survey of 1,122 adults conducted March 1-7, 56 percent of Americans find pot use to be socially acceptable, including 83 percent of marijuana users and 74 percent of those who have tried marijuana.

Yet when it comes to their own consumption, 31 percent of pot users prefer using marijuana alone.

Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/solitary-cons...38550.html

Why is this? Does it make some people paranoid to be around others?
Random German Guy Show this Post
04-19-2017, 12:44 PM #2
Random German Guy Incognito Anonymous
 
It depends on the person. In some cases yes, some no, and those who are teetering on insanity can't deal with it at all.
04-19-2017, 12:45 PM #3
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,146 Threads:599 Joined:Feb 2011
Anyone that has been smoking for a decent amount of time know it is because most people tend to not have their own smoke and it costs too damn much and can be too damn hard to find to share every day. Other than that I love to smoke with people.

 
And the people bowed and prayed
To the neon god they made
Random German Guy Show this Post
04-19-2017, 12:52 PM #4
Random German Guy Incognito Anonymous
 
Same here puffpuffpass.gif
I was reading something funny about the US ag the other day

Quote:“When they nominated me for attorney general, you would have thought the biggest issue in America was when I said, ‘I don’t think America’s going to be a better place if they sell marijuana at every corner grocery store,'” Sessions said Tuesday, according to AZ Central. “(People) didn’t like that; I’m surprised they didn’t like that.”
http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/12/sessio...-rhetoric/

It sounds like he's really out of touch. The latest polls from the US indicate around 70% are for full legalization, does this old man live under a rock, or do laws give him a woody?
04-19-2017, 01:00 PM #5
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,146 Threads:599 Joined:Feb 2011
(04-19-2017, 12:52 PM)Random German Guy Wrote:  Same here puffpuffpass.gif
I was reading something funny about the US ag the other day

Quote:“When they nominated me for attorney general, you would have thought the biggest issue in America was when I said, ‘I don’t think America’s going to be a better place if they sell marijuana at every corner grocery store,'” Sessions said Tuesday, according to AZ Central. “(People) didn’t like that; I’m surprised they didn’t like that.”
http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/12/sessio...-rhetoric/

It sounds like he's really out of touch. The latest polls from the US indicate around 70% are for full legalization, does this old man live under a rock, or do laws give him a woody?

He is VERY out of touch.

 
And the people bowed and prayed
To the neon god they made
04-19-2017, 01:34 PM #6
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,825 Threads:1,430 Joined:Feb 2011
Yeah, it is weird, like he doesn't read the papers out of touch.
I see a problem here already, and that's if after 4 years of Trump, pot is still classified like heroin, and healthcare has no single payer option, someone like Sanders could beat Trump...
That is, if the Dems didn't steal the nomination and hand it to someone who is not electable.

wonder.gif
04-19-2017, 02:15 PM #7
Meh Member
Posts:300 Threads:11 Joined:Apr 2017
The Alcohol, tobacco and pharmaceutical lobbies that pay big money to keep that charade up must own him, or he hasn't read a newspaper in 10 years. I refuse to believe he is stupid, which leaves one of two options, and the second seems unlikely.
04-19-2017, 08:53 PM #8
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,725 Threads:412 Joined:Jun 2012
Here is an interesting addiction theory...it basically puts forth that addiction is made worse by isolation/loneliness rather than increasing chemical dependence (cause and effect - to a lesser degree) and that if you are in an unhappy situation you may be more likely to become an addict. But, once you are no longer isolated and find yourself in a happy situation/life, then the need is no longer there. They also say shunning an addict just causes that addict to become worse within their addiction.

Quote:The writer George Monbiot has called this “the age of loneliness.” We have created human societies where it is easier for people to become cut off from all human connections than ever before. Bruce Alexander — the creator of Rat Park — told me that for too long, we have talked exclusively about individual recovery from addiction. We need now to talk about social recovery — how we all recover, together, from the sickness of isolation that is sinking on us like a thick fog.

But this new evidence isn’t just a challenge to us politically. It doesn’t just force us to change our minds. It forces us to change our hearts.

Loving an addict is really hard. When I looked at the addicts I love, it was always tempting to follow the tough love advice doled out by reality shows like Intervention — tell the addict to shape up, or cut them off. Their message is that an addict who won’t stop should be shunned. It’s the logic of the drug war, imported into our private lives. But in fact, I learned, that will only deepen their addiction — and you may lose them altogether. I came home determined to tie the addicts in my life closer to me than ever — to let them know I love them unconditionally, whether they stop, or whether they can’t.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-har...mg00000003

So, don't toke alone (even though MJ is non-addictive - boredom might cause you to want to be stoned all the time). I wonder if the 31% were isolated and unhappy?
04-19-2017, 11:41 PM #9
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,146 Threads:599 Joined:Feb 2011
(04-19-2017, 01:34 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  Yeah, it is weird, like he doesn't read the papers out of touch.
I see a problem here already, and that's if after 4 years of Trump, pot is still classified like heroin, and healthcare has no single payer option, someone like Sanders could beat Trump...
That is, if the Dems didn't steal the nomination and hand it to someone who is not electable.

I fully expect Oprah to run next election.

 
And the people bowed and prayed
To the neon god they made
04-20-2017, 01:39 AM #10
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,458 Threads:70 Joined:Feb 2011
I like it on my own
'specially a good sativa if I'm in manic mode
a cool indica
for studies of history and such
or a perfectly balanced one
for meditation

and jazz

hmm.gif

Not that I mind being with...umh...friends either chuckle.gif
04-20-2017, 07:48 AM #11
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,825 Threads:1,430 Joined:Feb 2011
I can't say I have a preference one way or another. dunno.gif

wonder.gif
04-20-2017, 08:40 AM #12
Mars Member
Posts:384 Threads:21 Joined:Aug 2013
I love it alone when I'm out on the boat fishing, but I also like to do it with friends. I drive fine on it, but don't ever do that because I have minor heart attacks if I see a cop car. rofl.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
04-20-2017, 09:15 AM #13
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
lmao.gif Same here.
04-20-2017, 09:56 AM #14
Strigoi Member
Posts:527 Threads:36 Joined:Mar 2011
(04-19-2017, 12:44 PM)Random German Guy Wrote:  It depends on the person. In some cases yes, some no, and those who are teetering on insanity can't deal with it at all.

People do most drugs to escape reality, but pot sort of lets you look into it. There are people who look inward and are scared of what they see, that's one of the reason some have an aversion. Strait-edgers scare me. aaah2.gif

Un Strigoi printre noi
04-20-2017, 10:14 AM #15
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,458 Threads:70 Joined:Feb 2011
yup.gif

The good herb reveals oneself to oneself.



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com