#Login Register

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

11-10-2012, 04:16 PM #1
Posts:4,526 Threads:1,029 Joined:Jun 2012

A steadily growing percentage of Americans realize some form of threat does exist that actually challenges the continued existence of this Republic. At the end of an election, after the glow of the victory passes a group of Americans are lamenting the vote of Barack Obama as President of the United States.

It cannot be determined if the disappointment is because of blind party loyalty to the Republican charade or if it is because we all know deep down that Barack Obama has a keen interest in making the United States an even greater global power by securing its position as the crown jewel in the empire of the New World Order.

Since the attacks of September 11th, 2001, the so-called secrecy of the conspiracy no longer could be kept from the eyes of the public. In this age of information, more and more knowledge was gained and presented to the public about the future direction of the United States and its relationship with the United Nations and its various treaties and mandates. There were also a number of other groups that dictated U.S. policy that went beyond Congressional oversight.

The country was under the protection and guidance of the entities of the war room and the sinister movements of alphabet agencies like the CIA and the NSA.

Several writers and commentators revealed that there was most certainly “shadow government” and how they were executing what is called the task of “controlled disintegration” of our economy in order to level the playing field of the wider world economy.

Starting in 1973, the Council on Foreign Relations embarked upon a massive, nation changing project it named “Project 1980s.” This project had at its core, the policy of “controlled disintegration” of world economy in order to reconstruct a socialist government based on the Chinese model.

Several key policies of “Project 80s,” were major issues that dealt with the now hugely propagandized ecology and climate “problems” and the task of population reduction. Controlled disintegration of the economy would force the world into a new kind of socialism.

Not surprisingly, many American watchdogs were already speaking of the new “threats” to the world that would have to be presented to the public as an urgent issue and excuse to suspend the constitution and revisit the possibility of a unified government policy that all governments could be happy with using and enforcing.

Just days after the Presidential election, there are now several key members of Barack Obama’s cabinet that are stepping down and one of the more interesting figures stepping away from the cabinet is Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Many are thinking that Hillary is stepping away to prepare to run for the presidency in 2016. While this may be a more logical speculation, there is one other speculation that Hillary now has done her job and after the Benghazi scandal she is best suited to go back to her duties of being a world figure best used in bringing forward the agenda of global government under the direction of the United Nations and her CFR handlers.

Hillary Clinton admitted in an address to the Council on Foreign Relations what Carroll Quigley wrote about in the book “Tragedy and Hope”, Dan Smoot wrote about in “The Invisible Government” and Gary Allen wrote about in “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” – and that is the United States is not under the control of a constitutional government. It is being controlled by special committees and social engineers that want to create the New Socialist Order.

The Globalist permanent revolution persists and exists with the direction of such figures as Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Sha Zukang and others who have authored the direction of the global agenda including UN Agenda 21 and most recently the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, “Rio +20.″

There has always been the shadow government, and the United States has only functioned because it has been allowed to do so under the direction of the Council on Foreign relations and other groups that secretly control governments and their livelihoods.

The greater conspiracy has been the “open conditioning and coercion process” that has taken decades to implement and program into the critical mass. Overt criminality by leaders and passive, unclear thinking by the proletariat has become the norm in The United States. The two go together, creating a symbiotic ecosystem of tyranny.

Fraud, theft, and murder have become widespread; just as the scale of lies told and believed have reached new heights. Irresponsibility has become socialized while people in the honest pursuit of good get thwarted. The transition from one form of government to another will be negligible because of forces we cannot and do not know how to fight against.

Sha Zukang who was a member of the communist dictatorship ruling mainland China, was the organizer and author of the Global government plan for sustainability. He also is the UN Conference Secretary-General of the Global Sustainability summit held last summer in Brazil.

Sha Zukang has been one of the notorious “planners” at the United Nations for a sustainability framework based on the Chinese Model. This is the Chinese framework that I have spoken of since 2009 as the government of the proposed New World Order.

Last year, Zukang said that the main objective for the global sustainability conferences will be to solidify support from governments around the world in the global pursuit of “sustainable development.” They are now speeding the process to require the creation of an “institutional framework” otherwise known as the global enforcement bureaucracy to mandate compliance by the world’s national governments and populations.

This is no longer conspiracy theory but fact. The plan for the United States is in fact compliance to a new form of government based on economic models of China. Among other countries, the addendum to Agenda 21 particularly praises China as “a good example of combining investments and public policy incentives to encourage major advances in the development of cleaner technologies.”

The Obama administration fully supports this agenda and is involved with the structuring of a global policy that will not sit well with most Americans who value their sovereignty and believe in the myth that their tax dollars go to services provided by Government to programs within the United States.

According to Jeffrey Klein, an economist analyst from Michigan, the entire agenda includes demands that – if implemented in the United States – will directly change our lifestyles. He cites the guidelines provided by U.N, General Secretary Ban Ki Moon that will create “profound changes in economic systems, in resource efficiency, in the composition of global demand, in production and consumption patterns and a major transformation in public policy-making.” It will also require “a serious rethinking of lifestyles in developed countries.”

The new United Nations reports on global sustainability include adopting a series of political philosophies that most people compare to those of Marx and Engel’s “Communist Manifesto,” wherein its’ organizational and operational structure appears to largely be a paraphrasical equivalent to the 10 short-term demands Marx prescribed in section II., “Proletarians and Communists.”

However, instead of the UN overthrowing the capitalist system, it simply wants to tie it to a leash and be subject to the UN’s ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ to redistribute wealth around the world to “magically elevate the poverty class to the middle class.

As Hillary Clinton steps down as Secretary of State, the rumor is that she will be replaced by UN Ambassador Susan Rice. Susan Rice is a globalist security advocate. She believes in bringing 192 countries together to share the cost of providing stability, vital aid and hope in the world’s most broken places. She is also an advocate of a strike in Syria and the establishment of a US/UN/NATO occupation on African soil. Rice also believes that it is an American responsibility to eliminate poverty and to share the wealth with impoverished nations. Rice has repeatedly said that the United States should devote up to 0.7 percent of U.S. gross domestic product to poor nations, a target set as part of the UN’s Millennium Development Project, for overseas development assistance by 2015.

This is accomplished once again by the use of carbon trading schemes, reproductive laws similar to the ones implemented in China, eugenics directives against the sick and the elderly and very deep cuts in energy uses by the United States and an offering of resources and land to other countries that apparently need it more than we do.

In various speeches provided by Barack Obama in the beginning of his presidency the United States was of course being sold out to globalists. He constantly has been nailing into the minds of Americans that we are now preparing to “finish the work of perfecting our union.”

Referring to America as an “unfinished working” or “a union that is about to be perfected.” The union would not be for the benefit of the sovereign, it was hinted at the global citizen model and the Chinese model. It is now evident that this is the mission of the United Nations sustainability agenda, a new world of redistributed wealth, and the threat of global catastrophe as the reason for drastic measures and a more communist world government.

This all rings similar to a successful campaign provided by the Nazis where they introduced a romantic nationalistic green ideology declaring that the German master race would purify itself by taking the German landscape away from the asphalt culture of the big cities and free market capitalism.

The ideology of “Blood and Soil” or Blut und Boden was not nearly as far reaching as its own laws maintained. This should not be surprising since the Nazis were undoubtedly far more interested in using environmental laws to restrict Jews, capitalism and private property, not their own national socialist agenda. Their idea of global sustainability of course was eliminating the carbon footprints of 6 million Jews.

History of course is showing that it can be forgotten and the same agendas can be revived because the critical mass has developed a myopic view towards the machinations of a globalist hijacking of the planet.

Do not be mislead about what the common vision means for you. The common vision that they want us all to share is the fearful future of manufactured crises and solutions that include separating the people and eventually culling or removing them.

Many of the policies and common visions of Agenda 21 share the same ideals as f the charter of the Trilateral Commission. Zbigniew Brzezinski, Barack Obama’s foreign adviser, was the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission along with David Rockefeller.

The original stated purpose of the Trilateral Commission was to create a “New International Economic Order.” Its current statement has morphed into fostering a “closer cooperation among these core democratic industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system. The Global plan is for all countries to live on the level of third world nations.

Economic sustainability can be achieved through a process known as “end game” strategies. Which include controls on ecological systems such as food, water and air. The agenda would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation – even deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas, it would monitor all lands and people through tracking and scientific measures such as biometrics and eugenics.

As the world moves further into economic chaos, eugenics – an old idea cloaked under modern terminology – is making a comeback. During these times it is easy to see how resurgence and re-packaging of eugenics could come about. In the case of Global Warming and economic sustainability, we hear these questions asked by proponents: Do you have more than two children? Is your carbon footprint putting a strain on the environment? Have you lived a good life? Have you ever considered giving up some of that good life for others in countries that do not have as much as you?

In the agendas of world economic and environmental sustainability, your economic burden on society cannot be tolerated during unprecedented economic times. The growing population of elderly individuals will be an incredible burden on a faltering system. Some governmental think tanks see younger generations pursuing euthanasia policies as an option. While we are asked to recycle waste, there are those who wish to recycle or remove Human life for world sustainability.

As the global planners hook you with “climate change” and the socially engineered “saving the planet from the environmental cataclysmic model” we could very well see in the future an urgency to justify laws requiring euthanasia, eugenic infanticide, futile care provisions, and weeding out those with undesirable genetic propensities.

Before I am accused of being a paranoid hack, I must indicate in all fairness that Tariq Banuri, the director of the U.N.’s Division for Sustainable Development, says that Agenda 21 is “not a binding treaty” but instead it’s an agenda of that has been produced a common vision. However, the common vision is for the elites and not the average American.

The common vision they speak of will be through force and coercion. The common vision of a globalism based in Marxist philosophies has shown a historical track record of bloodletting and population reduction.

11-10-2012, 04:42 PM #2
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,202 Threads:1,487 Joined:Feb 2011
Funny how the average American hasn't a clue as to what's being done to them right under their noses.


11-10-2012, 04:47 PM #3
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:41,166 Threads:1,571 Joined:Feb 2011
Since the UN is such a benign entity most people don't even give it a thought. It's for the good of mankind, right? damned.gif



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com