#Login Register

  • 6 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average

TX City chemical levels too high to be read by equipment
04-27-2011, 08:16 AM #1
Tacolover II Member
Posts:377 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011
Lying Bastards

"We have new information on what was being released into the air after a power outage affected a chemical plant and three refineries in Texas City.

Related Content

More: Air emissions report database

Story: Shelter-in-place order lifted in Texas City

Story: TAKS test rescheduled for TX City students

More: Got a story idea? Let us know!
The outage forced the plants into backup mode and they started burning off chemicals. We first told you about the outage Monday night, and a shelter-in-place was ordered and later lifted Tuesday afternoon.

Apparently, excess salt on power lines is to blame and on Tuesday afternoon we saw crews cleaning the lines.

Related Photos

Plants prompt shelter-in-place due to outages

View all 21 photos
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality now says the air on Tuesday morning in Texas City was so toxic that monitoring equipment couldn't go high enough to detect it all. The meters were pegged. That despite the fact we were told by at least three separate Texas City first responders that monitors didn't find anything out of the ordinary following the flares.

"It went bam and then in went up in flames," said Texas City resident Khristina Kelley. "It was a huge fire."

She lives close enough to the Texas City refineries to know without being told when there's a problem.

And last night she and all her neighbors knew there was a problem.

"The flares were extremely high; you could read a book out here," said Texas City resident Byron Rhoades.

Four plants were shut down. All of them were forced to flare or burn off whatever was in their pipes to remove the threat of an explosion. But when you do that, it releases potentially toxic chemicals.

"My eyes were burning. I had respiratory problems," said Rhoades.

He says he got those problems while inside his house following orders to shelter-in-place.

Texas City resident Analiese Gonzales had a similar reaction.

"I felt nauseated, real sick, lightheaded -- real bad. It started from the smell last night. I got a headache, but in the morning, it came back to me; I started throwing up," she said.

Scary, says Gonzales, because she's nine-months pregnant. She's one of at least 25 people who went to the Mainland Medical Center in Texas City complaining of respiratory problems.

"Symptoms were ear tingling, scratchiness," said Dr. Robin Armstrong of the Hospital of the Mainland.

And yet all day from Texas City we heard the shelter-in-place was a precaution.

Texas City Fire Department monitors never detected a thing.

"We got no readings," said Texas City Fire Department Captain Robert Ebert.

"It is absolutely unreasonable to believe that no one is being exposed to anything," said Matthew Tejada of the Houston Air Alliance.

When Tejada heard what Texas City was saying earlier Tuesday, he didn't believe it and said residents shouldn't either.

The late word from TCEQ of extremely high levels of toxic air confirmed his suspicion. He says the area needs real time monitoring for all to see.

"Until we start using all of the new monitoring technologies and until they're made transparent, there is little faith the community should put in one of those monitors," said Tejada.

We still don't know exactly what was released. Companies don't have to report for 24 hours after a release. But Byron Rhoades doesn't have to wait to know monitors didn't find what his own body did.

"I have problems breathing right now from last night. There is something in the air. You can't tell me there's not," Rhoades said.

Texas City says they weren't told about the TCEQ results until Tuesday afternoon. TCEQ says it passed the info on before 10am. But residents never knew until we told them. "

04-27-2011, 01:05 PM #2
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,202 Threads:1,487 Joined:Feb 2011
If the equipment cant pick it up, it has to be safe, sounds like a page out of TEPCO's disaster playbook. Any time a corporation has an accident they go into spin cycle and damage control first and foremost, it's all about public perception, board of directors, stock, et al.
Regard for human life doesn't really fit into the equation, besides as long as there is capitalism everyone is expendable.


04-27-2011, 02:52 PM #3
Tacolover II Member
Posts:377 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011
(04-27-2011, 01:05 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  If the equipment cant pick it up, it has to be safe, sounds like a page out of TEPCO's disaster playbook. Any time a corporation has an accident they go into spin cycle and damage control first and foremost, it's all about public perception, board of directors, stock, et al.
Regard for human life doesn't really fit into the equation, besides as long as there is capitalism everyone is expendable.

All it does is piss people of and lose trust in their lies. Even IF they had not known they should have their asses sued by the people for misleading the people under false pretenses. Which I do not believe is the case as the Refiners and Chemical Company cautioned about going outside, closing up their house and leave the air conditioning off overnight and well in to the next day. That's got to be uncomfortable, it's freaking hot down here...gaah.gif



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com