#Login Register


  • 239 Vote(s) - 3.74 Average
Home 


The Fukushima Disaster
07-30-2013, 03:06 AM #1,246
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,627 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
Second report of unwelcome emissions in less than one week

“Something like steam” continued to billow out of Fukushima’s nuclear reactor 3 building on Tuesday morning, the Tokyo Electric Power Co. said, confirming the latest omen that the ongoing nuclear catastrophe will not end any time soon.

http://intellihub.com/2013/07/24/somethi...fukushima/
07-30-2013, 03:07 AM #1,247
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,627 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
Never in all of history has a world event with such reaching consequences to human life as those represented by the meltdown of the reactors at Fukushima been so thoroughly and absolutely covered up. By now the effects of the radioactive pollution from the plant have encompassed our planet and, as higher radiation levels for the aquatic life in the Pacific Ocean are scantly reported, life, or more probably death goes on as if nothing of any real consequence has actually occurred.

After the meltdown of a single reactor in Chernobyl in 1986, there seemed to be a constant vigil to track the spread of the radiation and the consequences to human life in the Soviet Union and around the world. But back then, the coverage served a political purpose. We weren’t to look at the failure of Chernobyl as a consequence of the bad decision in building these death plants, but rather the inferior system of government in the Soviet Union that allowed the failure to occur.

http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.co...t-up/52175
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-30-2013, 03:02 PM #1,248
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Quote:Fukushima radiation levels as high as 2011

Water samples taken at an underground passage below the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant contain alarming levels of radiation which are comparable to those taken immediately after the catastrophe.

According to a Saturday statement by Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the tested water contains 2.35 billion becquerels of cesium per liter, and the radioactive water is now seeping into the sea. The findings were also evident from samples taken within a 50-meter radius around the plant.

TEPCO’s specialists have hit a wall trying to solve the problem of the leaking groundwater, which has persisted since 2011. However, unlike then, they cannot tell what the source of the newfound radioactivity is. The current explanation is that the radioactive water that had been left in the underground trench some two years ago is now mixing with the groundwater, which is in turn contaminating the sea.
Read more: http://rt.com/news/japan-fukushima-radia...evels-689/

This is catastrophic and not getting better.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
08-03-2013, 10:37 PM #1,249
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 


08-04-2013, 05:50 PM #1,250
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,627 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
M6 quake shakes northeastern Japan; no tsunami risk

TOKYO —
A strong earthquake shook northeastern Japan on Sunday in the same region devastated by a giant tsunami and temblor 2-1/2 years ago, but there were no immediate reports of damage or injuries.

The quake with a preliminary magnitude of 6.0 struck at 12:29 p.m., and was centered off the coast of Miyagi Prefecture, and 50 kilometers below the seabed.

The quake shook a wide region, including Fukushima and Iwate prefectures, and there was no risk of a tsunami, the Japan Meteorological Agency said.

Tokyo Electric Power Co, the utility that runs Fukushima Daiichi, said no problems were reported there or at another one of its nuclear plants in Fukushima, and that there were no power outages and radiation monitors did not show any change.

Tohoku Electric Power Co also said no problems were detected at its Onagawa nuclear plant in Miyagi Prefecture.

Some roads were blocked off and some trains stopped running temporarily for safety checks, broadcaster NHK TV said.

http://www.japantoday.com/category/natio...unami-risk
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
08-04-2013, 09:13 PM #1,251
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(08-04-2013, 05:50 PM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  M6 quake shakes northeastern Japan; no tsunami risk

TOKYO —
A strong earthquake shook northeastern Japan on Sunday in the same region devastated by a giant tsunami and temblor 2-1/2 years ago, but there were no immediate reports of damage or injuries.

The quake with a preliminary magnitude of 6.0 struck at 12:29 p.m., and was centered off the coast of Miyagi Prefecture, and 50 kilometers below the seabed.

The quake shook a wide region, including Fukushima and Iwate prefectures, and there was no risk of a tsunami, the Japan Meteorological Agency said.

Tokyo Electric Power Co, the utility that runs Fukushima Daiichi, said no problems were reported there or at another one of its nuclear plants in Fukushima, and that there were no power outages and radiation monitors did not show any change.

Tohoku Electric Power Co also said no problems were detected at its Onagawa nuclear plant in Miyagi Prefecture.

Some roads were blocked off and some trains stopped running temporarily for safety checks, broadcaster NHK TV said.

http://www.japantoday.com/category/natio...unami-risk

From what I read over at enenews, the earthquakes that occur in and around fukushima, are related to the coriums in the earth. The coriums are creating nuclear explosions deep within the earth.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
08-04-2013, 10:03 PM #1,252
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Quietly into disaster
A Plea for Survival

After watching this movie you simply can’t support nuclear
energy any longer.

This movie deals with facts and topics concerning nuclear fission: damages done to health and environment, nuclear waste and politics, renewable energies, reactor safety, the serious implications of a nuclear accident and the public resistance.
Like us! http://www.quietly-into-disaster.com/



08-06-2013, 07:06 PM #1,253
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,681 Threads:438 Joined:Jun 2012
Quote:In the early weeks of the disaster, the Japanese government allowed Tepco to dump tens of thousands of tonnes of contaminated water into the Pacific in an emergency move. The toxic water release was heavily criticized by neighboring countries as well as local fishermen and the utility has since promised it would not dump irradiated water without the consent of local townships.

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/...-says?lite

When do other world governments deem these actions crimes against humanity? damned.gif

"The nuclear regulatory task force met on Friday to discuss the situation at the plant, and concluded immediate action, and new measures, was required to stop radioactive water leakage into the ocean."

http://www.examiner.com/article/emergenc...into-ocean

I hope they find a solution ... fast!
08-08-2013, 08:57 PM #1,254
Ruby Wolf Member
Posts:10,255 Threads:721 Joined:Oct 2012
Theres 300 tons of radioactive water flowing into the pacific ocean daily...

I hope the political officials wont try and blow that out of proportion and make themselves even more megabucks,like they already do with their fear mongering mantras about how humans are responsible for greenhouse earth and the polar ice caps melting,when in reality those calamities are being caused by unstoppable and naturally occurring cycles of that star we call the sun...

But they probably will...

According to NOAA the National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration...

Earths oceans contain 36,614,237,300,000,000,000,000 gallons of water...

So rest assured that any radioactive whatever thats being released into the ocean will be quickly diluted and rendered ineffective and harmless and meaningless...

Many underwater detonations of nuclear weapons were carried out through the years and they released a helluva lot of radioactivity into the earths oceans and nothing was really poisoned and harmed by them...

The earths oceans are unimaginably vast and deep...

Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
08-08-2013, 09:21 PM #1,255
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(08-08-2013, 08:57 PM)Beyond Smolensk Wrote:  Theres 300 tons of radioactive water flowing into the pacific ocean daily...

I hope the political officials wont try and blow that out of proportion and make themselves even more megabucks,like they already do with their fear mongering mantras about how humans are responsible for greenhouse earth and the polar ice caps melting,when in reality those calamities are being caused by unstoppable and naturally occurring cycles of that star we call the sun...

But they probably will...

According to NOAA the National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration...

Earths oceans contain 36,614,237,300,000,000,000,000 gallons of water...

So rest assured that any radioactive whatever thats being released into the ocean will be quickly diluted and rendered ineffective and harmless and meaningless...

Many underwater detonations of nuclear weapons were carried out through the years and they released a helluva lot of radioactivity into the earths oceans and nothing was really poisoned and harmed by them...

The earths oceans are unimaginably vast and deep...


You are vastly misunderstanding the situation. 300 tonnes is a low ball number, Fact is. TWO YEARS after the event, turning point, they are still having to cool the coriums! Might want to look up bio accumulation of radiation in the food chain. That a report last year hit the mainstream, where Tuna off the US coast was found to contain cesium, which they tracked from fukushima. just a headline from today — Gundersen: No way to stop Fukushima’s radioactive water going into Pacific — It will continue for at least 20-30 years

One of the biggest creators of oxygen on the planet Plankton, what happens when the Plankton is affected by the radiation?

I could go on and list a myriad of other problems at fukushima, The spent fuel materials, what's left, that didn't explode far and wide into the atmosphere on 3/11. The fact that the reactor buildings sit on top of an aquifer, which they are sinking into.

Oh and no technology currently exists that can handle the coriums.

Granted C02 con, is a game of fear another mechanism of control and profit. But at fukushima maybe, just maybe the psychos realized they ƒükkêd up big time. But I have my doubts that they really care.
08-09-2013, 06:36 AM #1,256
Ruby Wolf Member
Posts:10,255 Threads:721 Joined:Oct 2012
(08-08-2013, 09:21 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(08-08-2013, 08:57 PM)Beyond Smolensk Wrote:  Theres 300 tons of radioactive water flowing into the pacific ocean daily...

I hope the political officials wont try and blow that out of proportion and make themselves even more megabucks,like they already do with their fear mongering mantras about how humans are responsible for greenhouse earth and the polar ice caps melting,when in reality those calamities are being caused by unstoppable and naturally occurring cycles of that star we call the sun...

But they probably will...

According to NOAA the National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration...

Earths oceans contain 36,614,237,300,000,000,000,000 gallons of water...

So rest assured that any radioactive whatever thats being released into the ocean will be quickly diluted and rendered ineffective and harmless and meaningless...

Many underwater detonations of nuclear weapons were carried out through the years and they released a helluva lot of radioactivity into the earths oceans and nothing was really poisoned and harmed by them...

The earths oceans are unimaginably vast and deep...


You are vastly misunderstanding the situation. 300 tonnes is a low ball number, Fact is. TWO YEARS after the event, turning point, they are still having to cool the coriums! Might want to look up bio accumulation of radiation in the food chain. That a report last year hit the mainstream, where Tuna off the US coast was found to contain cesium, which they tracked from fukushima. just a headline from today — Gundersen: No way to stop Fukushima’s radioactive water going into Pacific — It will continue for at least 20-30 years

One of the biggest creators of oxygen on the planet Plankton, what happens when the Plankton is affected by the radiation?

I could go on and list a myriad of other problems at fukushima, The spent fuel materials, what's left, that didn't explode far and wide into the atmosphere on 3/11. The fact that the reactor buildings sit on top of an aquifer, which they are sinking into.

Oh and no technology currently exists that can handle the coriums.

Granted C02 con, is a game of fear another mechanism of control and profit. But at fukushima maybe, just maybe the psychos realized they f*cked up big time. But I have my doubts that they really care.

300 tons or 3,000 tons daily makes no difference imo...

Earths oceans contain 36,614,237,300,000,000,000,000 gallons of water...

1 gallon of water weighs 8 pounds...

Which means the earths oceans contain 292,913,898,400,000,000,000,000 pounds of water...

Thats two hundred and ninety three billion trillion pounds of ocean water!

Thats one trillion...two hundred and ninety three billion times!

Which means 292,913,898,400,000,000,000,000 pounds of ocean water contains...

36,614,237,300,000,000,000,000 gallons of ocean water...

300 tons of radioactive water weighs 600,000 pounds...

600,000 pounds equals 75,000 gallons of radioactive water...

So we have 75,000 gallons of radioactive water flowing into...

36,614,237,300,000,000,000,000 gallons of ocean water...

Thats thirty six billion trillion gallons of ocean water!

Thats one trillion...thirty six billion times!

Those staggering numbers are speaking very loudly for themselves...

Obviously revealing how 300 tons of radioactive water daily is doing nothing to the ocean...

The solar rays of that star up there we call the sun...

Are probably pouring 10,000 times that much radiation down upon and into the earths oceans every second of every day...

And directly into and through our bodies constantly as well...

Quote: As of January 18, 2013 in 31 countries 437 nuclear power plant units with an installed electric net capacity of about 372 GW are in operation and 68 plants with an installed capacity of 65 GW are in 15 countries under construction.

http://www.euronuclear.org/info/encyclop...d-wide.htm

Friggin progress...

Thats just f###en great...

Thats just really f###en awesome...

Tptb love flirting with disaster dont they...

08-09-2013, 05:09 PM #1,257
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,681 Threads:438 Joined:Jun 2012
And we just find out now that a plant in Taiwan (a COASTAL plant) has been leaking for quite some time. wtf2.gif

Quote:Taiwan has also had problems on what to do with its nuclear waste, which for many years was dumped on a small island off its southeast coast, to the anger of its aboriginal inhabitants.

Taiwan has previously considered sending its nuclear waste to the Pacific Ocean state of the Marshall Islands and even North Korea.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/asia/902389...nt-leaking

Not only do they not know what to do with the nuclear waste, but they can't handle the safe operation of these plants.

damned.gif
08-10-2013, 10:12 AM #1,258
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,235 Threads:209 Joined:Apr 2013
(08-09-2013, 06:36 AM)Beyond Smolensk Wrote:  
(08-08-2013, 09:21 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(08-08-2013, 08:57 PM)Beyond Smolensk Wrote:  Theres 300 tons of radioactive water flowing into the pacific ocean daily...

I hope the political officials wont try and blow that out of proportion and make themselves even more megabucks,like they already do with their fear mongering mantras about how humans are responsible for greenhouse earth and the polar ice caps melting,when in reality those calamities are being caused by unstoppable and naturally occurring cycles of that star we call the sun...

But they probably will...

According to NOAA the National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration...

Earths oceans contain 36,614,237,300,000,000,000,000 gallons of water...

So rest assured that any radioactive whatever thats being released into the ocean will be quickly diluted and rendered ineffective and harmless and meaningless...

Many underwater detonations of nuclear weapons were carried out through the years and they released a helluva lot of radioactivity into the earths oceans and nothing was really poisoned and harmed by them...

The earths oceans are unimaginably vast and deep...


You are vastly misunderstanding the situation. 300 tonnes is a low ball number, Fact is. TWO YEARS after the event, turning point, they are still having to cool the coriums! Might want to look up bio accumulation of radiation in the food chain. That a report last year hit the mainstream, where Tuna off the US coast was found to contain cesium, which they tracked from fukushima. just a headline from today — Gundersen: No way to stop Fukushima’s radioactive water going into Pacific — It will continue for at least 20-30 years

One of the biggest creators of oxygen on the planet Plankton, what happens when the Plankton is affected by the radiation?

I could go on and list a myriad of other problems at fukushima, The spent fuel materials, what's left, that didn't explode far and wide into the atmosphere on 3/11. The fact that the reactor buildings sit on top of an aquifer, which they are sinking into.

Oh and no technology currently exists that can handle the coriums.

Granted C02 con, is a game of fear another mechanism of control and profit. But at fukushima maybe, just maybe the psychos realized they f*cked up big time. But I have my doubts that they really care.

300 tons or 3,000 tons daily makes no difference imo...

Earths oceans contain 36,614,237,300,000,000,000,000 gallons of water...

1 gallon of water weighs 8 pounds...

Which means the earths oceans contain 292,913,898,400,000,000,000,000 pounds of water...

Thats two hundred and ninety three billion trillion pounds of ocean water!

Thats one trillion...two hundred and ninety three billion times!

Which means 292,913,898,400,000,000,000,000 pounds of ocean water contains...

36,614,237,300,000,000,000,000 gallons of ocean water...

300 tons of radioactive water weighs 600,000 pounds...

600,000 pounds equals 75,000 gallons of radioactive water...

So we have 75,000 gallons of radioactive water flowing into...

36,614,237,300,000,000,000,000 gallons of ocean water...

Thats thirty six billion trillion gallons of ocean water!

Thats one trillion...thirty six billion times!

Those staggering numbers are speaking very loudly for themselves...

Obviously revealing how 300 tons of radioactive water daily is doing nothing to the ocean...

The solar rays of that star up there we call the sun...

Are probably pouring 10,000 times that much radiation down upon and into the earths oceans every second of every day...

And directly into and through our bodies constantly as well...

Quote: As of January 18, 2013 in 31 countries 437 nuclear power plant units with an installed electric net capacity of about 372 GW are in operation and 68 plants with an installed capacity of 65 GW are in 15 countries under construction.

http://www.euronuclear.org/info/encyclop...d-wide.htm

Friggin progress...

Thats just f###en great...

Thats just really f###en awesome...

Tptb love flirting with disaster dont they...

Your calculation is for one day. There are 365 days in a year and this could go on for 30 years. 365 times 30 = 19,500 which would be divided into the 36,614,237,300,000,000,000,000.

Now we are talking about a much smaller dilution. Plus you are thinking all the radioactivity is evenly distributed in the oceans from the moment it hits the water. But that is not the case at all. Thus your huge number sounds good but it is meaningless.

Only about 1 millionth of the ocean's water is near Fukushima to pick a round number. IOW, the marine life that is in the area will suffer so much it will contaminate the fish and flora that come into contact with the radioactive material.

But the problem is not isolated. According to the EPA surveys of US milk supplies has 2,000% higher readings of radioactivity that what is allowable. So the EPA is raising the acceptable level which is not a solution but a concession. Milk radioactivity is an excellent barometer of overall radiation exposure in our food supply.

Pray for me. hug.gif

08-10-2013, 09:31 PM #1,259
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,235 Threads:209 Joined:Apr 2013
(03-16-2013, 04:10 PM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  Sigh.................

This thread should be renamed - Fukushima isn't the disaster - it is a terrible loss of asset problem and cleanup problem for the utility.
From Wiki:

The National Police Agency has confirmed 15,881 deaths,[22] 6,142 injured,[23] and 2,668 people missing[24] across twenty prefectures.[25]

As of 30 April 2012, 18 people had died and 420 had been injured while participating in disaster recovery or clean-up efforts.[195]

Japanese funerals are normally elaborate Buddhist ceremonies which entail cremation. The thousands of bodies, however, exceeded the capacity of available crematoriums and morgues, many of them damaged,[181][182] and there were shortages of both kerosene—each cremation requires 50 liters—and dry ice for preservation.[183] The single crematorium in Higashimatsushima, for example, could only handle four bodies a day, although hundreds were found there.


Some areas around Miyako have subsided (sunk) 4 feet.

As far as the power plant is concerned

According to a June 2012 Stanford University study, the radiation released could cause 130 deaths from cancer (the lower bound for the estimater being 15 and the upper bound 1100) and 180 cancer cases (the lower bound being 24 and the upper bound 1800), mostly in Japan.

An additional approximately 600 deaths [around Fukushima] have been reported due to non-radiological causes such as mandatory evacuations.

The total radiation casualties to date: there may be 3 children with thyroid cancer.


Those stats are total bullsh**. GIGO Garbage in garbage out with their assumptions. There may be three children with thyroid cancer????????

In the US still births and miscarriages are up over 25% since Fukushima even though we are 6,000 to 9,000 miles away, but only three children might have thyroid cancer???????

Pray for me. hug.gif

08-13-2013, 02:56 AM #1,260
Ruby Wolf Member
Posts:10,255 Threads:721 Joined:Oct 2012
The earths oceans are all connected into one immense body of water and theres 36,614,237,300,000,000,000,000 gallons of ocean water (thirty six billion trillion gallons of ocean water) (one trillion gallons thirty six billion times) constantly diluting and dissipating and chemically altering whatever (comparatively miniscule to the point of almost complete and utter meaninglessness) radioactive tonnage thats being released daily and all that incomprehensibly vast amount of flowing and circulating ocean water is rendering the microscopic in comparison amount of 75,000 gallons of radioactive water released into it daily as absolutely inconsequential and as I mentioned theres probably 10,000 times that amount of radioactivity pouring down from the sun and into the ocean every second of every day and night...



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com