#Login Register


  • 241 Vote(s) - 3.75 Average
Home 


The Fukushima Disaster
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
09-28-2013, 11:36 PM #1,306
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(09-28-2013, 01:20 PM)Maddogg Wrote:  Here's a good question what type of fish is still safe to eat? Maybe someone who follows this more closely has some insight! I love wild alasken salmon, this still a safe choice uhoh.gif

No I wouldn't chance it. I would say its a high risk, from what I've have read from others online, who are more knowledgeable than me on the subject. I would stay clear from seafood. Labeling is not honest anyway. Plus the oceans are being over fished as it is. I would recommend doing some research at this site and keep monitoring it for updates. http://sccc.org.au/archives/2861

also see 24th September 2013 – American safety limit for the imports of Japanese food is 12 times more lax than Japan.
http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/09/ameri...han-japan/
JP Gov “There is no technology to remove Tritium from contaminated water”/Appeal international world for technology.

Comment:

Tritium density in the storage tanks at Fukushima is approx. 100,000,000,000 Bq/m3, half life 12.32 years. It combines with oxygen to form a liquid called tritiated water, T2O.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritiated_water
Hugh amounts of Tritiated water would have to be flowing into the Pacific Ocean as they can’t filter it out.
[url] http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/09/jp-go...echnology/[/url]

http://www.nsr.go.jp/committee/yuushikis...006_04.pdf

http://www.nsr.go.jp/committee/yuushikis...kanshi_wg/

28.08.2013 - Radioactive water may contaminate entire Pacific Ocean in 6 years!

http://www.arirang.co.kr/News/News_View.asp?nseq=150718

http://www.arirang.co.kr/Player/News_Vod...Seq=150718
10-03-2013, 08:22 PM #1,307
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,136 Threads:428 Joined:Jun 2012
Quote:Another day, another radioactive-water spill. The operator of the meltdown-plagued Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant says at least 430 litres (110 gallons) spilled when workers overfilled a storage tank that lacked a gauge that could have warned them of the danger.

http://globalnews.ca/news/879667/overflo...fukushima/

sad2.gif ...no gauge!!!??? What's left to say about this that I haven't already said? sad2.gif
10-04-2013, 04:54 AM #1,308
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,938 Threads:154 Joined:Apr 2013
(10-03-2013, 08:22 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
Quote:Another day, another radioactive-water spill. The operator of the meltdown-plagued Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant says at least 430 litres (110 gallons) spilled when workers overfilled a storage tank that lacked a gauge that could have warned them of the danger.

http://globalnews.ca/news/879667/overflo...fukushima/

sad2.gif ...no gauge!!!??? What's left to say about this that I haven't already said? sad2.gif

The end of the world brought to you by the unwillingness to hire a decent plumber.

Pray for me. hug.gif
10-05-2013, 07:01 PM #1,309
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,136 Threads:428 Joined:Jun 2012
Quote:About 800 people worldwide will get cancer from radiation due to Fukushima in fish eaten to date, according to Georgia Straight calculations. The Straight results relied on a widely used cancer-risk formula developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as well as radiation levels in 33,000 fish tested by the Japanese Fisheries Agency.

Half the cancers will be fatal. About 500 will be in Japan; 75 will be due to Japanese fish exports to other countries; and 225 will be from fishing in the Pacific by nations other than Japan.

And that’s likely only a small part of the actual long-term cancer impacts from eating the fish. Two nuclear experts who saw the Straight’s figures said the real cancer toll could be 100 times higher—or 80,000 cancers.

http://www.straight.com/life/497646/fish...-fukushima

Don't eat Pacific Ocean caught fish unless you know for sure it is safe...and who do we trust to tell us that information?

"The CFIA did more radiation tests on Japanese food imports in the Vancouver region in September and October 2012; it still hasn’t released those results. Asked why the information has not been made public, Koutsavakis said that it is still being analyzed a year later: “It’s just a matter of doing the work based on the risk. That’s why it took longer.”

What the hell does that mean?
10-05-2013, 08:13 PM #1,310
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,938 Threads:154 Joined:Apr 2013
(10-05-2013, 07:01 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
Quote:About 800 people worldwide will get cancer from radiation due to Fukushima in fish eaten to date, according to Georgia Straight calculations. The Straight results relied on a widely used cancer-risk formula developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as well as radiation levels in 33,000 fish tested by the Japanese Fisheries Agency.

Half the cancers will be fatal. About 500 will be in Japan; 75 will be due to Japanese fish exports to other countries; and 225 will be from fishing in the Pacific by nations other than Japan.

And that’s likely only a small part of the actual long-term cancer impacts from eating the fish. Two nuclear experts who saw the Straight’s figures said the real cancer toll could be 100 times higher—or 80,000 cancers.

http://www.straight.com/life/497646/fish...-fukushima

Don't eat Pacific Ocean caught fish unless you know for sure it is safe...and who do we trust to tell us that information?

"The CFIA did more radiation tests on Japanese food imports in the Vancouver region in September and October 2012; it still hasn’t released those results. Asked why the information has not been made public, Koutsavakis said that it is still being analyzed a year later: “It’s just a matter of doing the work based on the risk. That’s why it took longer.”

What the hell does that mean?

damned.gif

Some possibilities as to what Koutsavakis meant:

1- The guys doing the testing maxed out on their annual exposure, so they are looking for new suckers to replace them

2- They are waiting for the government to raise the official safe levels so that the fish can be declared safe under the new regulations.

3- His dog ate his homework.

4- Koutsavakis is looking for a promotion so he can get the hell away from radioactive fish.

5- "Mind your own beezwax, Mister! We did the test. That's all YOU need to know....um, waiter, cancel the grilled tuna and bring me another martini."

Pray for me. hug.gif
10-05-2013, 08:18 PM #1,311
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,136 Threads:428 Joined:Jun 2012
(10-05-2013, 08:13 PM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(10-05-2013, 07:01 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
Quote:About 800 people worldwide will get cancer from radiation due to Fukushima in fish eaten to date, according to Georgia Straight calculations. The Straight results relied on a widely used cancer-risk formula developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as well as radiation levels in 33,000 fish tested by the Japanese Fisheries Agency.

Half the cancers will be fatal. About 500 will be in Japan; 75 will be due to Japanese fish exports to other countries; and 225 will be from fishing in the Pacific by nations other than Japan.

And that’s likely only a small part of the actual long-term cancer impacts from eating the fish. Two nuclear experts who saw the Straight’s figures said the real cancer toll could be 100 times higher—or 80,000 cancers.

http://www.straight.com/life/497646/fish...-fukushima

Don't eat Pacific Ocean caught fish unless you know for sure it is safe...and who do we trust to tell us that information?

"The CFIA did more radiation tests on Japanese food imports in the Vancouver region in September and October 2012; it still hasn’t released those results. Asked why the information has not been made public, Koutsavakis said that it is still being analyzed a year later: “It’s just a matter of doing the work based on the risk. That’s why it took longer.”

What the hell does that mean?

damned.gif

Some possibilities as to what Koutsavakis meant:

1- The guys doing the testing maxed out on their annual exposure, so they are looking for new suckers to replace them

2- They are waiting for the government to raise the official safe levels so that the fish can be declared safe under the new regulations.

3- His dog ate his homework.

4- Koutsavakis is looking for a promotion so he can get the hell away from radioactive fish.

5- "Mind your own beezwax, Mister! We did the test. That's all YOU need to know....um, waiter, cancel the grilled tuna and bring me another martini."

I really should not laugh at that, but...
10-05-2013, 09:46 PM #1,312
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,938 Threads:154 Joined:Apr 2013
(10-05-2013, 08:18 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(10-05-2013, 08:13 PM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(10-05-2013, 07:01 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
Quote:About 800 people worldwide will get cancer from radiation due to Fukushima in fish eaten to date, according to Georgia Straight calculations. The Straight results relied on a widely used cancer-risk formula developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as well as radiation levels in 33,000 fish tested by the Japanese Fisheries Agency.

Half the cancers will be fatal. About 500 will be in Japan; 75 will be due to Japanese fish exports to other countries; and 225 will be from fishing in the Pacific by nations other than Japan.

And that’s likely only a small part of the actual long-term cancer impacts from eating the fish. Two nuclear experts who saw the Straight’s figures said the real cancer toll could be 100 times higher—or 80,000 cancers.

http://www.straight.com/life/497646/fish...-fukushima

Don't eat Pacific Ocean caught fish unless you know for sure it is safe...and who do we trust to tell us that information?

"The CFIA did more radiation tests on Japanese food imports in the Vancouver region in September and October 2012; it still hasn’t released those results. Asked why the information has not been made public, Koutsavakis said that it is still being analyzed a year later: “It’s just a matter of doing the work based on the risk. That’s why it took longer.”

What the hell does that mean?

damned.gif

Some possibilities as to what Koutsavakis meant:

1- The guys doing the testing maxed out on their annual exposure, so they are looking for new suckers to replace them

2- They are waiting for the government to raise the official safe levels so that the fish can be declared safe under the new regulations.

3- His dog ate his homework.

4- Koutsavakis is looking for a promotion so he can get the hell away from radioactive fish.

5- "Mind your own beezwax, Mister! We did the test. That's all YOU need to know....um, waiter, cancel the grilled tuna and bring me another martini."

I really should not laugh at that, but...

lmao.gif Laugh! Laugh! That's WHY I wrote it!

I little humor brings the point home.

Pray for me. hug.gif
10-06-2013, 03:54 PM #1,313
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,777 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
chuckle.gif Good one BAG.

This is ... damned.gif

10-06-2013, 04:16 PM #1,314
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,136 Threads:428 Joined:Jun 2012
I signed the petition at Nukefree.org...please take a moment to sign it?

http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/the-wor...rce=search

http://enenews.com/nuclear-engineers-fuk...rted-video

Read #5...now we have to worry about Plant #3. damned.gif
10-06-2013, 09:08 PM #1,315
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,938 Threads:154 Joined:Apr 2013
(10-06-2013, 03:54 PM)Shadow Wrote:  chuckle.gif Good one BAG.

This is ... damned.gif

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...ucjTiOXxSQ

That's an excellent video, Shadow. It explains things simply and visually in a way that illustrates what the danger is. Thanks for sharing it.

Pray for me. hug.gif
10-06-2013, 10:47 PM #1,316
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,938 Threads:154 Joined:Apr 2013
(10-06-2013, 04:16 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  I signed the petition at Nukefree.org...please take a moment to sign it?

http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/the-wor...rce=search

http://enenews.com/nuclear-engineers-fuk...rted-video

Read #5...now we have to worry about Plant #3. damned.gif

Thank you for the second link especially. There is a video from Arnie Gunderson that is really good.

Pray for me. hug.gif
10-07-2013, 10:42 PM #1,317
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,136 Threads:428 Joined:Jun 2012
(10-06-2013, 10:47 PM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(10-06-2013, 04:16 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  I signed the petition at Nukefree.org...please take a moment to sign it?

http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/the-wor...rce=search

http://enenews.com/nuclear-engineers-fuk...rted-video

Read #5...now we have to worry about Plant #3. damned.gif

Thank you for the second link especially. There is a video from Arnie Gunderson that is really good.

Did you mean this video by him? I watched the video below and he certainly makes it very clear what exactly is going on and what is required.

http://fairewinds.org/media/fairewinds-v...ma-daiichi
10-08-2013, 04:26 AM #1,318
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,938 Threads:154 Joined:Apr 2013
(10-07-2013, 10:42 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(10-06-2013, 10:47 PM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(10-06-2013, 04:16 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  I signed the petition at Nukefree.org...please take a moment to sign it?

http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/the-wor...rce=search

http://enenews.com/nuclear-engineers-fuk...rted-video

Read #5...now we have to worry about Plant #3. damned.gif


Thank you for the second link especially. There is a video from Arnie Gunderson that is really good.

Did you mean this video by him? I watched the video below and he certainly makes it very clear what exactly is going on and what is required.

http://fairewinds.org/media/fairewinds-v...ma-daiichi

That is the one. cheers.gif

Pray for me. hug.gif
10-09-2013, 03:55 PM #1,319
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,136 Threads:428 Joined:Jun 2012
Quote:The workers removed the wrong pipe from equipment at the plant, sending toxic water spilling onto them and the entire floor of the facility housing a set of three units designed for primary, partial water treatment, said Yoshimi Hitosugi, the spokesman for Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/09...68891.html

sad2.gif
Lisa Boxx Show this Post
10-20-2013, 08:36 PM #1,320
Lisa Boxx Incognito Anonymous
 



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com