#Login Register


  • 239 Vote(s) - 3.74 Average
Home 


The Fukushima Disaster
12-14-2013, 11:42 PM #1,351
mcmxc Member
Posts:89 Threads:0 Joined:Dec 2013
And I STILL had to explain to my girlfriend the reason Japan isn't a great place to travel next summer. The media should be addressing this...
12-19-2013, 12:06 AM #1,352
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,728 Threads:439 Joined:Jun 2012
Tepco to shut down two reactors. yay.gif

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-25434996
12-22-2013, 03:41 PM #1,353
Shadow Incognito Anonymous
 
12-22-2013, 08:20 PM #1,354
NODOOM Truthtard
Posts:4,897 Threads:522 Joined:Sep 2012
Forget about all the Nibiru, Elenin, Ison, Brown dwarf Doom etc.

This is the real deal on the Doom. gaah.gif

İmage

Life is like a penny, you can spend it on what you like, but you can ONLY spend it once.


https://twitter.com/NigelLondon2014

DanielofDoriaa Show this Post
12-24-2013, 02:43 PM #1,355
DanielofDoriaa Incognito Anonymous
 
12-30-2013, 01:11 AM #1,356
NODOOM Truthtard
Posts:4,897 Threads:522 Joined:Sep 2012



Life is like a penny, you can spend it on what you like, but you can ONLY spend it once.


https://twitter.com/NigelLondon2014

12-30-2013, 06:17 AM #1,357
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,373 Threads:228 Joined:Apr 2013
NEWS ALERT:

In recent days (12/19, 12/24, 12/25, 12/28) Building #3 has released radioactive steam which is an indication that the plant could be going CRITICAL.

Bldg. #3 is the one where the rods are being removed. There is zero chance that such a plan could be carried out without an accident occurring. The recent radioactive appear to be bearing that out.

TEPCO says they don't know what is causing it. No one can go inside the building to see because death would ensue in one hour from the radioactivity that is present there.

More than likely there will be RADCON 5's in the US by the first several days of the new year.

http://www.turnerradionetwork.com/news/146-mjt

Pray for me. hug.gif

12-30-2013, 10:01 PM #1,358
NODOOM Truthtard
Posts:4,897 Threads:522 Joined:Sep 2012



Life is like a penny, you can spend it on what you like, but you can ONLY spend it once.


https://twitter.com/NigelLondon2014

12-30-2013, 10:37 PM #1,359
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,728 Threads:439 Joined:Jun 2012
Well, as per testing from this group, it seems the highly migratory Pacific tuna are not affected with radioactive residue.

http://www.bccdc.ca/NR/rdonlyres/8BECDE5...pt24th.pdf

http://www.bccdc.ca/healthenv/Radiation/....htm#I-131
01-02-2014, 09:26 AM #1,360
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,373 Threads:228 Joined:Apr 2013
(12-30-2013, 10:37 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Well, as per testing from this group, it seems the highly migratory Pacific tuna are not affected with radioactive residue.

http://www.bccdc.ca/NR/rdonlyres/8BECDE5...pt24th.pdf

http://www.bccdc.ca/healthenv/Radiation/....htm#I-131

They tested the tuna for parts per thousands and call that an adequate test??

And what the hell do they mean radioactive "RESIDUE"? They better not find any "residue." That would be catastrophic. They should be doing readings of radioactivity, not looking for residue.

Pray for me. hug.gif

01-02-2014, 08:44 PM #1,361
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,728 Threads:439 Joined:Jun 2012
(01-02-2014, 09:26 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(12-30-2013, 10:37 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Well, as per testing from this group, it seems the highly migratory Pacific tuna are not affected with radioactive residue.

http://www.bccdc.ca/NR/rdonlyres/8BECDE5...pt24th.pdf

http://www.bccdc.ca/healthenv/Radiation/....htm#I-131

They tested the tuna for parts per thousands and call that an adequate test??

And what the hell do they mean radioactive "RESIDUE"? They better not find any "residue." That would be catastrophic. They should be doing readings of radioactivity, not looking for residue.

Would not testing for radioactivity in any form still be testing for radioactivity?
01-02-2014, 10:14 PM #1,362
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,373 Threads:228 Joined:Apr 2013
(01-02-2014, 08:44 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(01-02-2014, 09:26 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(12-30-2013, 10:37 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Well, as per testing from this group, it seems the highly migratory Pacific tuna are not affected with radioactive residue.

http://www.bccdc.ca/NR/rdonlyres/8BECDE5...pt24th.pdf

http://www.bccdc.ca/healthenv/Radiation/....htm#I-131

They tested the tuna for parts per thousands and call that an adequate test??

And what the hell do they mean radioactive "RESIDUE"? They better not find any "residue." That would be catastrophic. They should be doing readings of radioactivity, not looking for residue.

Would not testing for radioactivity in any form still be testing for radioactivity?

In my limited experience to be sure, I've never seen the word "residue" used when it comes to radioactivity which are high energy waves. Residue is a term used for physically detectable substances.

I also bothers me that the equipment only goes to the forth decimal point.

Note also that Japan, Canada and the US has raised the acceptable limits of exposure by a factor of 10 since the Fukushima accident. Why? Radiation hasn't suddenly become 10 times safer.

Pray for me. hug.gif

01-03-2014, 03:58 AM #1,363
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,373 Threads:228 Joined:Apr 2013
Sorcha Faal is reporting a nuclear explosion took place under Building # 3 on December 31st.

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1729.htm

It looks like real reporting. After the previous releases of radioactive steam, it's possible there was an explosion.

Pray for me. hug.gif

01-03-2014, 04:06 AM #1,364
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,373 Threads:228 Joined:Apr 2013
The radiation map at Fukushima is showing a reading of 142,000 at this minute.

What is odd is that the map always has a green badge for that area. The badges are highly misleading. It must work on a moving average. Thus a 142,000 reading is about average for that spot.

Their readings change perhaps as often as every minute, so your reading could differ from the 142,000 reported here.

http://netc.com/

Pray for me. hug.gif

01-03-2014, 12:16 PM #1,365
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,728 Threads:439 Joined:Jun 2012
And another odd happening from my source, the scientists at Tepco have announced that they are taking a New Years break and will resume speaking with the press on January 6th.

I'm not sure, but if there was a nuclear explosion there wouldn't they all be rushing back there at this time? blink.gif

http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/tepco...s-holiday/



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com