#Login Register


  • 241 Vote(s) - 3.75 Average
Home 


The Fukushima Disaster
01-02-2014, 10:14 PM #1,366
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,868 Threads:146 Joined:Apr 2013
(01-02-2014, 08:44 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(01-02-2014, 09:26 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(12-30-2013, 10:37 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Well, as per testing from this group, it seems the highly migratory Pacific tuna are not affected with radioactive residue.

http://www.bccdc.ca/NR/rdonlyres/8BECDE5...pt24th.pdf

http://www.bccdc.ca/healthenv/Radiation/....htm#I-131

They tested the tuna for parts per thousands and call that an adequate test??

And what the hell do they mean radioactive "RESIDUE"? They better not find any "residue." That would be catastrophic. They should be doing readings of radioactivity, not looking for residue.

Would not testing for radioactivity in any form still be testing for radioactivity?

In my limited experience to be sure, I've never seen the word "residue" used when it comes to radioactivity which are high energy waves. Residue is a term used for physically detectable substances.

I also bothers me that the equipment only goes to the forth decimal point.

Note also that Japan, Canada and the US has raised the acceptable limits of exposure by a factor of 10 since the Fukushima accident. Why? Radiation hasn't suddenly become 10 times safer.

Pray for me. hug.gif
01-03-2014, 03:58 AM #1,367
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,868 Threads:146 Joined:Apr 2013
Sorcha Faal is reporting a nuclear explosion took place under Building # 3 on December 31st.

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1729.htm

It looks like real reporting. After the previous releases of radioactive steam, it's possible there was an explosion.

Pray for me. hug.gif
01-03-2014, 04:06 AM #1,368
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,868 Threads:146 Joined:Apr 2013
The radiation map at Fukushima is showing a reading of 142,000 at this minute.

What is odd is that the map always has a green badge for that area. The badges are highly misleading. It must work on a moving average. Thus a 142,000 reading is about average for that spot.

Their readings change perhaps as often as every minute, so your reading could differ from the 142,000 reported here.

http://netc.com/

Pray for me. hug.gif
01-03-2014, 12:16 PM #1,369
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,980 Threads:425 Joined:Jun 2012
And another odd happening from my source, the scientists at Tepco have announced that they are taking a New Years break and will resume speaking with the press on January 6th.

I'm not sure, but if there was a nuclear explosion there wouldn't they all be rushing back there at this time? blink.gif

http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/tepco...s-holiday/
01-03-2014, 11:48 PM #1,370
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,980 Threads:425 Joined:Jun 2012
I found up to date reports on this site, but you have to register.

http://nucleus.iaea.org/sso/NUCLEUS.html...g/inisnkm/

..and this about rainwater leakage.

http://nucleus.iaea.org/sso/NUCLEUS.html...g/inisnkm/

I need an nuclear engineer to explain these number to me...any takers?

https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/...ion_units/

http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/UCBAirSampli...alculation

More reading for you conspiracy theorists and doomtards. I'm still reading...

http://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/r...e_effects/
01-04-2014, 08:35 AM #1,371
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,868 Threads:146 Joined:Apr 2013
(01-03-2014, 12:16 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  And another odd happening from my source, the scientists at Tepco have announced that they are taking a New Years break and will resume speaking with the press on January 6th.

I'm not sure, but if there was a nuclear explosion there wouldn't they all be rushing back there at this time? blink.gif

http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/tepco...s-holiday/

The excuse used to postpone future reports wouldn't give me a lot of confidence. How in the world can they be running an incredibly high risk operation with the removal of fuel rods and not report daily how they are proceeding!

Their unwillingness to REPORT what is going on should send shivers up your spine.

Pray for me. hug.gif
01-04-2014, 03:02 PM #1,372
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,980 Threads:425 Joined:Jun 2012
(01-04-2014, 08:35 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(01-03-2014, 12:16 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  And another odd happening from my source, the scientists at Tepco have announced that they are taking a New Years break and will resume speaking with the press on January 6th.

I'm not sure, but if there was a nuclear explosion there wouldn't they all be rushing back there at this time? blink.gif

http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/tepco...s-holiday/

The excuse used to postpone future reports wouldn't give me a lot of confidence. How in the world can they be running an incredibly high risk operation with the removal of fuel rods and not report daily how they are proceeding!

Their unwillingness to REPORT what is going on should send shivers up your spine.

Hey BAG, why not register on this site as there are up to date reports. I'm just not sure how to read the measured results. Maybe you could help here.

http://nucleus.iaea.org/sso/NUCLEUS.html...g/inisnkm/
01-05-2014, 01:36 AM #1,373
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,868 Threads:146 Joined:Apr 2013
(01-04-2014, 03:02 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 08:35 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(01-03-2014, 12:16 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  And another odd happening from my source, the scientists at Tepco have announced that they are taking a New Years break and will resume speaking with the press on January 6th.

I'm not sure, but if there was a nuclear explosion there wouldn't they all be rushing back there at this time? blink.gif

http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/tepco...s-holiday/


The excuse used to postpone future reports wouldn't give me a lot of confidence. How in the world can they be running an incredibly high risk operation with the removal of fuel rods and not report daily how they are proceeding!

Their unwillingness to REPORT what is going on should send shivers up your spine.

Hey BAG, why not register on this site as there are up to date reports. I'm just not sure how to read the measured results. Maybe you could help here.

http://nucleus.iaea.org/sso/NUCLEUS.html...g/inisnkm/

Thanks for the invite, Unique. The problem is that I don't trust the IAEA to give full and complete information or even accurate information. It's populated by nuclear apologists. It didn't help any that El Baradai (sp?) was their former head.

Pray for me. hug.gif
01-05-2014, 07:34 AM #1,374
Softy Incognito Anonymous
 
(01-03-2014, 04:06 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  The radiation map at Fukushima is showing a reading of 142,000 at this minute.

What is odd is that the map always has a green badge for that area. The badges are highly misleading. It must work on a moving average. Thus a 142,000 reading is about average for that spot.

Their readings change perhaps as often as every minute, so your reading could differ from the 142,000 reported here.

http://netc.com/

Yeah,,,that green badge got me wondering wtf as well,,,

sure we are not alone in that,,,strange,,,and it seems it is

always green,,,never changes on any I have seen,,,

over time...

(:X
01-05-2014, 05:57 PM #1,375
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,980 Threads:425 Joined:Jun 2012
(01-05-2014, 01:36 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 03:02 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 08:35 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(01-03-2014, 12:16 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  And another odd happening from my source, the scientists at Tepco have announced that they are taking a New Years break and will resume speaking with the press on January 6th.

I'm not sure, but if there was a nuclear explosion there wouldn't they all be rushing back there at this time? blink.gif

http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/tepco...s-holiday/


The excuse used to postpone future reports wouldn't give me a lot of confidence. How in the world can they be running an incredibly high risk operation with the removal of fuel rods and not report daily how they are proceeding!

Their unwillingness to REPORT what is going on should send shivers up your spine.

Hey BAG, why not register on this site as there are up to date reports. I'm just not sure how to read the measured results. Maybe you could help here.

http://nucleus.iaea.org/sso/NUCLEUS.html...g/inisnkm/

Thanks for the invite, Unique. The problem is that I don't trust the IAEA to give full and complete information or even accurate information. It's populated by nuclear apologists. It didn't help any that El Baradai (sp?) was their former head.

I would agree all the measurements and information is confusing if one is not a nuclear engineer, but are all of them apologists, or are they actually stating facts?
01-05-2014, 11:16 PM #1,376
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,868 Threads:146 Joined:Apr 2013
(01-05-2014, 07:34 AM)Softy Wrote:  
(01-03-2014, 04:06 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  The radiation map at Fukushima is showing a reading of 142,000 at this minute.

What is odd is that the map always has a green badge for that area. The badges are highly misleading. It must work on a moving average. Thus a 142,000 reading is about average for that spot.

Their readings change perhaps as often as every minute, so your reading could differ from the 142,000 reported here.

http://netc.com/

Yeah,,,that green badge got me wondering wtf as well,,,

sure we are not alone in that,,,strange,,,and it seems it is

always green,,,never changes on any I have seen,,,

over time...

(:X

Yes, the shield colors are a total sham. If a location has had previous higher numbers, it appears to affect subsequent colors.

What's the point of providing color coding when Fukushima can get a green with the reading right now of 143,000? Same with the other nearby locations that are typically 4,000 to 5,000.

Pray for me. hug.gif
01-08-2014, 04:13 PM #1,377
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
Conjoined whale calves found dead in Mexican lagoon in world's first documented case of Siamese gray whales

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...hales.html

No idea if this has anything to do with Nukushima but... it's odd. And very sad.
01-08-2014, 04:25 PM #1,378
The Survivor Truthtard
Posts:5,013 Threads:522 Joined:Sep 2012



Life is like a penny, you can spend it on what you like, but you can ONLY spend it once.


https://twitter.com/NigelLondon2014

01-09-2014, 02:02 AM #1,379
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,868 Threads:146 Joined:Apr 2013
(01-05-2014, 05:57 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(01-05-2014, 01:36 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 03:02 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 08:35 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(01-03-2014, 12:16 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  And another odd happening from my source, the scientists at Tepco have announced that they are taking a New Years break and will resume speaking with the press on January 6th.

I'm not sure, but if there was a nuclear explosion there wouldn't they all be rushing back there at this time? blink.gif

http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/tepco...s-holiday/


The excuse used to postpone future reports wouldn't give me a lot of confidence. How in the world can they be running an incredibly high risk operation with the removal of fuel rods and not report daily how they are proceeding!

Their unwillingness to REPORT what is going on should send shivers up your spine.

Hey BAG, why not register on this site as there are up to date reports. I'm just not sure how to read the measured results. Maybe you could help here.

http://nucleus.iaea.org/sso/NUCLEUS.html...g/inisnkm/

Thanks for the invite, Unique. The problem is that I don't trust the IAEA to give full and complete information or even accurate information. It's populated by nuclear apologists. It didn't help any that El Baradai (sp?) was their former head.

I would agree all the measurements and information is confusing if one is not a nuclear engineer, but are all of them apologists, or are they actually stating facts?

You might want to check out this story about the IAEA agreeing in writing to WITHHOLD/CONCEAL information about Fukushima.

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/201...alresponse

Pray for me. hug.gif
01-09-2014, 03:05 AM #1,380
The Survivor Truthtard
Posts:5,013 Threads:522 Joined:Sep 2012
shocked.gif wtf2.gif doom.jpg

Life is like a penny, you can spend it on what you like, but you can ONLY spend it once.


https://twitter.com/NigelLondon2014




Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com