(01-09-2014, 02:02 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:(01-05-2014, 05:57 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:(01-05-2014, 01:36 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:(01-04-2014, 03:02 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:(01-04-2014, 08:35 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote: The excuse used to postpone future reports wouldn't give me a lot of confidence. How in the world can they be running an incredibly high risk operation with the removal of fuel rods and not report daily how they are proceeding!
Their unwillingness to REPORT what is going on should send shivers up your spine.
Hey BAG, why not register on this site as there are up to date reports. I'm just not sure how to read the measured results. Maybe you could help here.
Thanks for the invite, Unique. The problem is that I don't trust the IAEA to give full and complete information or even accurate information. It's populated by nuclear apologists. It didn't help any that El Baradai (sp?) was their former head.
I would agree all the measurements and information is confusing if one is not a nuclear engineer, but are all of them apologists, or are they actually stating facts?
You might want to check out this story about the IAEA agreeing in writing to WITHHOLD/CONCEAL information about Fukushima.
I glanced over the agreement and it is somewhat confusing, in that their aim appears to be to provide public awareness on radiological effects of public health, yet the information is treated as confidential and highly classified and the IAEA has no freedom to act independently.