#Login Register


  • 241 Vote(s) - 3.75 Average
Home 


The Fukushima Disaster
04-26-2014, 01:23 AM #1,426
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,794 Threads:1,183 Joined:Feb 2011
They've Found the Missing Fukushima Nuclear Cores ... Scattered All Over Japan

But now, it turns out that some of the Fukushima reactors have suffered even a more extreme type of damage: melt-OUTS.

By way of background, we’ve noted periodically that scientists have no idea where the cores of the nuclear reactors are.

And that highly radioactive black “dirt” has been found all over Japan.

It turns out that the highly radioactive black substances are likely remnants of the core.

http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/201...over-japan

Unconfirmed of course.
05-04-2014, 11:28 PM #1,427
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,809 Threads:1,430 Joined:Feb 2011
A number of independent researchers have demonstrated that long-term, relatively low levels of radiation may wreak up to 1000 times more biological havoc than the currently accepted “risk levels” that are being used as reference points for decisions about licensing and operating nuclear plants.

In 1972, a researcher in Canada, Dr. Abram Petkau, found that when cells were irradiated slowly, a smaller total dose was needed to cause damage. Since this critical discovery it has been verified that a small dose of radiation over a long time is more damaging than one larger dose. Imagine the ramifications! This means that the small amounts of radiation that are released from the everyday operation of the world’s 400 nuclear plants are doing much more damage than calculated.

More here: http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=5119

wonder.gif
05-05-2014, 03:57 AM #1,428
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,717 Threads:412 Joined:Jun 2012
wtf2.gif Chernobyl, one violent earthquake and it may crumble.

Quote:According to the Polish newspaper Zycie Warszawy, the surface is riddled with cracks and fissures large enough to allow rats to pass through. The interior is also full of mosquitoes which one journalist noted “are definitely larger than normal." Meanwhile, an independent engineering report has suggested that the entire structure would collapse in the event of an earthquake measuring six or higher on the Richter scale, thereby sending large clouds of radioactive dust across Europe yet again. To their credit, Ukrainian officials have spoken at great lengths about building a new and improved sarcophagus that will last for 100 years, but the structure’s prospective $2 billion price tag is presently proving prohibitive.

http://ca.askmen.com/entertainment/speci...-know.html
05-05-2014, 04:12 AM #1,429
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,717 Threads:412 Joined:Jun 2012
(05-04-2014, 11:28 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  A number of independent researchers have demonstrated that long-term, relatively low levels of radiation may wreak up to 1000 times more biological havoc than the currently accepted “risk levels” that are being used as reference points for decisions about licensing and operating nuclear plants.

In 1972, a researcher in Canada, Dr. Abram Petkau, found that when cells were irradiated slowly, a smaller total dose was needed to cause damage. Since this critical discovery it has been verified that a small dose of radiation over a long time is more damaging than one larger dose. Imagine the ramifications! This means that the small amounts of radiation that are released from the everyday operation of the world’s 400 nuclear plants are doing much more damage than calculated.

More here: http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=5119

Are you saying that nuclear plants are not containing the radiation (except Fukushima, of course)? From this article, this is all they wrote on 'Time perspective'. wtf2.gif

Quote: Time perspective

The health effects of exposure both to radiation and to chemical cancer-inducing agents or toxins must be considered in relation to time. There is cause for concern not only about the effects on people presently living, but also about the cumulative effects of actions today over many generations.

Some radioactive materials which reach the environment decay to safe levels within days, weeks or a few years, while others continue their effect for a long time, as do most chemical cancer-inducing agents and toxins. Certainly this is true of the chemical toxicity of heavy metals such as mercury, cadmium and lead. These of course are a natural part of the human environment anyway, like radiation, but maintain their toxicity forever. The essential task for those in government and industry is to prevent excessive amounts of such toxins harming people, now or in the future. Standards are set in the light of research on environmental pathways by which people might ultimately be affected.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Safety...h-Effects/
05-05-2014, 06:26 AM #1,430
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,692 Threads:129 Joined:Apr 2013
(05-04-2014, 11:28 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  A number of independent researchers have demonstrated that long-term, relatively low levels of radiation may wreak up to 1000 times more biological havoc than the currently accepted “risk levels” that are being used as reference points for decisions about licensing and operating nuclear plants.

In 1972, a researcher in Canada, Dr. Abram Petkau, found that when cells were irradiated slowly, a smaller total dose was needed to cause damage. Since this critical discovery it has been verified that a small dose of radiation over a long time is more damaging than one larger dose. Imagine the ramifications! This means that the small amounts of radiation that are released from the everyday operation of the world’s 400 nuclear plants are doing much more damage than calculated.

More here: http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=5119

100% agree!

Dr. Emanuel Revici was invited by the US Navy to come to work for them in 1947 based on his advanced worked in healing radiation sickness and injury.

Although he declined, he continued to examine the effects of radiation. In 1950 he was invited to give a lecture in London regarding his findings.

Dr. Revici discovered that radiation changes the atomic structure (shape) of fatty acids that are situated on the cell wall in such a way that it blocks oxygen from being transported inside the cell.

A normal fatty acid actively transports the oxygen into the cell. But the altered shape makes the transport impossible.

So the cell turns rancid.

You body might be able to fight off a few cells turning rancid, but the radiation keeps 'dinging' those fatty acids with its high energy and rancidity starts.

Have you ever seen a piece of meat that goes rancid stop being rancid? No, of course not. The rancidity spreads.

The same thing can happen to us if we have any radioactivity stored inside us from x-rays, CT scans, PET scans or radioactive fallout from a nuclear power plant.

One particle can keep dinging the fatty acids in our cells.

Revici devised a complex calculation he called the oxalic index. A healthy person should have an index of -0-.

People with cancer often have an index of 2 to 4.

When a person's index gets up to somewhere between 14 and 17, they die.

Pray for me. hug.gif
05-08-2014, 04:19 PM #1,431
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,101 Threads:1,457 Joined:Feb 2011
Spooky shots of the abandoned Fukushima disaster area taken with a drone

<iframe src="//player.vimeo.com/video/92984683" width="500" height="281" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>

http://en.rocketnews24.com/2014/05/08/sp...h-a-drone/
05-09-2014, 12:17 AM #1,432
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,717 Threads:412 Joined:Jun 2012
(05-08-2014, 04:19 PM)Octo Wrote:  Spooky shots of the abandoned Fukushima disaster area taken with a drone

<iframe src="//player.vimeo.com/video/92984683" width="500" height="281" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>

http://en.rocketnews24.com/2014/05/08/sp...h-a-drone/

Just an observation, but the trees and plants seem to do very well in these conditions.
05-10-2014, 06:09 PM #1,433
Gumby AKA Chtumby
Posts:1,463 Threads:191 Joined:Mar 2013
Fukushima’s Cesium-137 levels ‘50% higher’ than previously estimated

Quote:The original estimate of 13,600 terabecquerels was made by Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), the operator of the power station. However, a new report by Japanese researchers estimates that between 17,500 and 20,500 terabecquerels have been released, which is 50 percent higher than originally thought.

http://rt.com/news/158084-fukushima-nucl...an-cesium/

I'm really amazed at the lack of Global Outrage over this mess.

As well as the Lies.

gaah.gif
05-10-2014, 09:32 PM #1,434
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,692 Threads:129 Joined:Apr 2013
Each terabecquerel is a TRILLION becquerels.

The increase in the lost radiation is in THOUSANDS of TRILLIONS becquerels.

Using a percentage comparison of a 50% increase grossly minimizes the impact because the focus should be 50% of WHAT?

If you make $13 an hour and get a 50% pay raise, your new rate is $19.50.

If you earn $13,000 teradollars an hour and you were to get a 50% increase, your new pay would be this:

$19,500,000,000,000,000 per hour
---->$17,000,000,000,000 = the US debt

IOW, the amount is approximately 1,150 times greater than the national debt.

When it comes to becquerels, they are measured in seconds rather than hours. So the radiation is RELEASING up to 20,000,000,000,000,000 decays a SECOND. damned.gif

Pray for me. hug.gif
05-12-2014, 04:20 PM #1,435
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,717 Threads:412 Joined:Jun 2012




Etiquette and methodology in Japan needs to change drastically IMO.

Tepco signs with Sellafield.

Quote:Tepco states it is significant to exchange knowledge and technology with Sellafield Ltd, which is the (so-called) leading company about decommissioning and decontamination of a nuclear plant.

http://fukushima-diary.com/2014/05/tepco...authority/

Sellafield's nuclear legacy:

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-24206028
05-15-2014, 12:48 AM #1,436
Gumby AKA Chtumby
Posts:1,463 Threads:191 Joined:Mar 2013
Drone Captures Fukushima Desolation Amid Cherry Blossoms



05-19-2014, 04:34 PM #1,437
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,809 Threads:1,430 Joined:Feb 2011
Source of Fukushima’s nagging radioactive leak finally discovered – TEPCO

The source of the radioactive leak at the earthquake-stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was finally identified by the facility’s operator TEPCO to be in the primary containment vessel of reactor 3, authorities reported.

It was in January when the crew of the plant first noticed that water was leaking through to the drain on the first level of the building housing the reactor.

TEPCO is at present trying to figure out the best strategy for plugging the leak.

wonder.gif
05-21-2014, 10:13 PM #1,438
Gumby AKA Chtumby
Posts:1,463 Threads:191 Joined:Mar 2013
CAUGHT ON CAMERA: FIRE AT FUKUSHIMA?

Quote:segment 1:16 into the clip and continuing for about 30 seconds (or about 6 minutes in the real world), certainly looks disturbing

http://www.blacklistednews.com/CAUGHT_ON...0/Y/M.html





Looks like smoke to me damned.gif
06-02-2014, 02:44 PM #1,439
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,717 Threads:412 Joined:Jun 2012
Mutant white asparagus is documented and Tepco begin construction on the ice wall tomorrow.

Quote:Staff of Japan Agricultural Cooperatives comments it must have been over 40cm long in the farm, and it is rare for white asparagus to grow to be this size.

İmage

http://fukushima-diary.com/2014/06/enorm...izu-machi/
06-07-2014, 03:17 PM #1,440
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,717 Threads:412 Joined:Jun 2012
Alberta teenager uses geiger counter to prove high radioactivity of fish and seaweed in Canadian grocery stores.

http://metronews.ca/news/calgary/982233/...e-seafood/

(In reading the comments of the above link, the measuring and levels of radioactivity debate continues)

Quote:In October, Dr. David Suzuki predicted that it would take three years from the time of the incident for the radiation plume to reach the West Coast. That would have been in the past month. That concept wasn’t lost on young Bronwyn.

“The way the currents and the radiation would arrive in Canada, it wouldn’t arrive until now, about 2014 or 2013,” she said.

In 2012, the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137, the radioactive form of cesium, was found in various seafood products that were imported from Japan, including:

• 73 percent of the mackerel

• 91 percent of the halibut

• 92 percent of the sardines

• 93 percent of the tuna and eel

• 94 percent of the cod and anchovies

• 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish

http://www.globalresearch.ca/fukushima-r...es/5376360

...and the leak continues...and the waters keep swirling to our shores...



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com