#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


The Hobbit Channel
JollyRoger Show this Post
11-30-2012, 05:47 AM #1
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
11-30-2012, 05:50 AM #2
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,577 Threads:1,443 Joined:Feb 2011
A prequel, how cool! beercheer.gif

wonder.gif
11-30-2012, 05:59 AM #3
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,361 Threads:1,482 Joined:Feb 2011
Awesome! I read the book many many years ago. beercheer.gif I was actually a hardcore Tolkien fan in my teens. Wrote an essay on him that was published in a Literary magazine. Even got some cash for that. hi5.gif I will definitely watch the movie.
JollyRoger Show this Post
11-30-2012, 06:14 AM #4
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
(11-30-2012, 05:59 AM)Octo Wrote:  Awesome! I read the book many many years ago. beercheer.gif I was actually a hardcore Tolkien fan in my teens. Wrote an essay on him that was published in a Literary magazine. Even got some cash for that. hi5.gif I will definitely watch the movie.


http://www.fandango.com/thehobbit:anunex...ieoverview

I heard there are two movies. Both 6hrs long?? Geezz.... 4hrs for LOTR was long. I'll have to pack a lunch.
JollyRoger Show this Post
11-30-2012, 06:16 AM #5
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
(11-30-2012, 06:14 AM)JollyRoger Wrote:  
(11-30-2012, 05:59 AM)Octo Wrote:  Awesome! I read the book many many years ago. beercheer.gif I was actually a hardcore Tolkien fan in my teens. Wrote an essay on him that was published in a Literary magazine. Even got some cash for that. hi5.gif I will definitely watch the movie.


http://www.fandango.com/thehobbit:anunex...ieoverview

I heard there are two movies. Both 6hrs long?? Geezz.... 4hrs for LOTR was long. I'll have to pack a lunch.


Scratch that....

“It’s looking like it’s going to be about ten minutes shorter than Fellowship was," said Jackson. "So it’s going to be officially our shortest Middle-earth yet. I mean, Fellowship was just under three hours and this is about 2 hours 40 minutes at the moment.”

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=96349
12-02-2012, 08:20 PM #6
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,361 Threads:1,482 Joined:Feb 2011
Cinema-goers have complained of feeling sick and dizzy after watching early screenings of The Hobbit.

Peter Jackson's eagerly awaited new film is the first to be shot using high-speed 3D cameras that capture twice the normal number of frames per second.

But some viewers said the filming techniques made them feel nauseous and even caused migraines.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...iness.html

emo-daj.gif
12-02-2012, 08:44 PM #7
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,849 Threads:655 Joined:Feb 2011
(11-30-2012, 06:14 AM)JollyRoger Wrote:  
(11-30-2012, 05:59 AM)Octo Wrote:  Awesome! I read the book many many years ago. beercheer.gif I was actually a hardcore Tolkien fan in my teens. Wrote an essay on him that was published in a Literary magazine. Even got some cash for that. hi5.gif I will definitely watch the movie.


http://www.fandango.com/thehobbit:anunex...ieoverview

I heard there are two movies. Both 6hrs long?? Geezz.... 4hrs for LOTR was long. I'll have to pack a lunch.


There will be three movies.

Politicians hide themselves away
They only started the war
Why should they go out to fight?
They leave that role to poor



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com