#Login Register


  • 12 Vote(s) - 2.67 Average
Home 


The Infinite Plane Universe
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-08-2019, 12:35 PM #331
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
(11-06-2019, 11:30 PM)grav Wrote:  Shills never contribute anything but nasty remarks. Nobody likes a smartass.
But as I've said for years, they do provoke us to refine our own understanding and methods of discourse
.
What is the sun, first of all?
a burning ball of fire? pfft. a nuclear reactor? pish
a plasma light bulb? dunno

Let's compare the sun to a jet plane, which cruises about 500 mph, often around 5 miles in altitude.
The sun is much higher, maybe 300 miles up. The Wild Heretic may say 3000 miles.
So I'll guess it also moves 500 mph.


I can't find the video Dr. Zach and his friends made a few years ago.
They tracked the position of the sun over a year and plotted it above the flat earth azimuthal_equidistant map. It looked something like this.

[Image: g8wdG.png]

velocity=length/time

height has nothing to do with it
from one noon to the next it's 24 hours, yes?
all you need now to calculate the velocity of your sun is the length of your equator

btw, even if it was "only" 500mph you'd still have a lot of centrifugal force
what's with that?
11-08-2019, 07:57 PM #332
grav Member
Posts:339 Threads:1 Joined:Jun 2019
Previous kritter, why do you apply centrifugal force to a light effect?
The sun has no mass. Even Eric Dollard says it's hollow, a capacitor, and interdimensional, drawing energy from another source. And it's dying.


I am not an encyclopedia of FE facts.
I have no desire to do your research. The information is available online.
Google is your friend.
But not mine. It deletes videos, memes, websites that I stored years ago.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-08-2019, 08:08 PM #333
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
(11-08-2019, 07:57 PM)grav Wrote:  Previous kritter, why do you apply centrifugal force to a light effect?
The sun has no mass. Even Eric Dollard says it's hollow, a capacitor, and  interdimensional, drawing energy from another source. And it's dying.


I am not an encyclopedia of FE facts.
I have no desire to do your research. The information is available online.
Google is your friend.
But not mine. It deletes videos, memes, websites that I stored years ago.

you are the one promoting flat earth
if you cannot back up your claims why should I bother?

you are asking for proof of globe earth all the time and dismiss the proof you get because you don't bother to research it and understand the physics behind it

so tell me again why I should bother with looking up stuff I know to be nonsense?



also: "the sun is a hollow interdimensional capacitor with zero mass"???
wtf2.gif lmao.gif rofl.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-08-2019, 08:15 PM #334
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
[Image: flat25.jpg]

stars circling the celestial south pole, Sydney Australia
11-08-2019, 10:27 PM #335
grav Member
Posts:339 Threads:1 Joined:Jun 2019
[Image: k86GjuSZtJ7e610UpBa9WrbKKU8As72oXVwnLqmC...9fa0e8ca48]

.

[Image: 100-diff-stars.jpg?resize=850%2C960&ssl=1]
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-08-2019, 11:52 PM #336
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
(10-20-2019, 08:48 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
Quote:If Octo wants me gone, I'll go.
Just say the words -- and I am history.

(10-18-2019, 11:12 PM)Octo Wrote:  
(10-18-2019, 08:41 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  Flat Earth threads belong on a flat earth forum.And there are flat earth forums.

amen

(11-08-2019, 10:27 PM)grav Wrote:  [Image: k86GjuSZtJ7e610UpBa9WrbKKU8As72oXVwnLqmC...9fa0e8ca48]

.

[Image: 100-diff-stars.jpg?resize=850%2C960&ssl=1]

37.gif but they have changed
we lately entered the "age of Aquarius"
know what that means?
or look at the Maya calendar, which covers thousands of years of celestial changes
11-09-2019, 08:38 PM #337
grav Member
Posts:339 Threads:1 Joined:Jun 2019
(11-08-2019, 11:52 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(10-20-2019, 08:48 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
Quote:If Octo wants me gone, I'll go.
Just say the words -- and I am history.

(10-18-2019, 11:12 PM)Octo Wrote:  
(10-18-2019, 08:41 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  Flat Earth threads belong on a flat earth forum.And there are flat earth forums.

amen

(11-08-2019, 10:27 PM)grav Wrote:  [Image: k86GjuSZtJ7e610UpBa9WrbKKU8As72oXVwnLqmC...9fa0e8ca48]

.

[Image: 100-diff-stars.jpg?resize=850%2C960&ssl=1]

37.gif  but they have changed
we lately entered the "age of Aquarius"
know what that means?
or look at the Maya calendar, which covers thousands of years of celestial changes

But the repeating patterns are still there.
The constellations should fall apart in less than a year.

[Image: 03-lecture-outline-35-638.jpg?cb=1455475604]


The Church threatened Brahe, and possibly Newton, with excommunication if they did not defend heliocenrrism.

Stellar parallax should be evident in 6 months. Considering the alleged insanely fast speeds and trajectories, stars should scatter like baby turtles on the beach.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-09-2019, 08:45 PM #338
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
(11-09-2019, 08:38 PM)grav Wrote:  
(11-08-2019, 11:52 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(10-20-2019, 08:48 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
Quote:If Octo wants me gone, I'll go.
Just say the words -- and I am history.

(10-18-2019, 11:12 PM)Octo Wrote:  
(10-18-2019, 08:41 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  Flat Earth threads belong on a flat earth forum.And there are flat earth forums.

amen

(11-08-2019, 10:27 PM)grav Wrote:  [Image: k86GjuSZtJ7e610UpBa9WrbKKU8As72oXVwnLqmC...9fa0e8ca48]

.

[Image: 100-diff-stars.jpg?resize=850%2C960&ssl=1]

37.gif  but they have changed
we lately entered the "age of Aquarius"
know what that means?
or look at the Maya calendar, which covers thousands of years of celestial changes

But the repeating patterns are still there.
The constellations should fall apart in less than a year.

[Image: 03-lecture-outline-35-638.jpg?cb=1455475604]


The Church threatened Brahe, and possibly Newton, with excommunication if they did not defend heliocenrrism.

Stellar parallax should be evident in 6 months. Considering the alleged insanely fast speeds and trajectories, stars should scatter like baby turtles on the beach.

excuse me, why should they "fall apart" in less than a year? wtf2.gif
do you know how far they are away?
their relative positions don't change that fast
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-09-2019, 08:52 PM #339
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
Stellar parallax is so difficult to detect that its existence was the subject of much debate in astronomy for hundreds of years. It was first observed in 1806 by Giuseppe Calandrelli who reported parallax in α-Lyrae in his work "Osservazione e riflessione sulla parallasse annua dall’alfa della Lira". Then in 1838 Friedrich Bessel made the first successful parallax measurement, for the star 61 Cygni, using a Fraunhofer heliometer at Königsberg Observatory.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_parallax
11-11-2019, 06:43 PM #340
grav Member
Posts:339 Threads:1 Joined:Jun 2019
The sun travels half a million mph.
Stars travel that speed and faster, in many different directions.

So everything is constantly moving billions of miles per year.

And yet we never see the constellations change over 6000 years.

And shills keep quoting from the Nasa handbook.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-11-2019, 07:55 PM #341
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
(11-11-2019, 06:43 PM)grav Wrote:  The sun travels half a million mph.
Stars travel that speed and faster, in many different directions.

So everything is constantly moving billions of miles per year.

And yet we never see the constellations change over 6000 years.

And shills keep quoting from the Nasa handbook.

at astronomical distances those "billion miles" are merely arcseconds seen from earth

[Image: 6592_fig17_02.jpg]

[Image: Calculating+Distance+Using+Parallax.jpg]

[Image: Example%3A+Distance+to+Sirius.jpg]
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-12-2019, 03:09 AM #342
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
(11-11-2019, 06:43 PM)grav Wrote:  The sun travels half a million mph.
Stars travel that speed and faster, in many different directions.

So everything is constantly moving billions of miles per year.

And yet we never see the constellations change over 6000 years.

And shills keep quoting from the Nasa handbook.

OMG !

It takes FOUR AND A HALF BILLION YEARS, TRAVELING AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT, to cross this Universe !
That is how big ass it is and you expect to see changes with your eyes in the nano second you are alive on Earth ?????????????
Your mind is so small and cluttered with rubbish you are incapable of even imagining how big this place is !
11-12-2019, 05:35 AM #343
grav Member
Posts:339 Threads:1 Joined:Jun 2019
Bullarky!

Freemason fantasies.
[Image: hqdefault.jpg]

If off-the-shelf cameras can focus on planets and stars which are (acc. to Sagan) billions and billions of miles away, then they must really be a lot closer. A few hundred or thousand miles.

Like how Nasa computes distances to the sun. By triangulating from moving object rotten another movin object.

Ipse dixit bs.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-12-2019, 12:40 PM #344
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
(11-12-2019, 05:35 AM)grav Wrote:  Bullarky!

Freemason fantasies.
[Image: hqdefault.jpg]

If off-the-shelf cameras can focus on planets and stars which are (acc. to  Sagan) billions and billions of miles away, then they must really be a lot closer. A few hundred or thousand miles.

Like how Nasa computes distances to the sun. By triangulating from moving object rotten another movin object.

Ipse dixit bs.

go look through a telescope
instead of at stupid cellphone pictures
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-13-2019, 12:49 AM #345
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
(11-12-2019, 05:35 AM)grav Wrote:  Bullarky!

Freemason fantasies.
[Image: hqdefault.jpg]

If off-the-shelf cameras can focus on planets and stars which are (acc. to  Sagan) billions and billions of miles away, then they must really be a lot closer. A few hundred or thousand miles.

Like how Nasa computes distances to the sun. By triangulating from moving object rotten another movin object.

Ipse dixit bs.

You are looking at the end of the light shaft when looking at a Star !
Have you not learned that a Star Billions of light years away, may not be there anymore, as it takes that long for the light shaft to collapse ?



Home 





Copyright © 2011 - 2020 kritterbox.com