#Login Register


  • 14 Vote(s) - 3.07 Average
Home 


The Jupiter Flashes don’t make sense as “impacts”, here’s why.
Jupiter Show this Post
07-07-2016, 06:06 PM #1
Jupiter Incognito Anonymous
 
https://www.amazon.com/Jovian-Transforma...nav-subnav

They are creating very large light effects yet they are leaving no trace of debris of heat. Of course, no incoming objects have been spotted either.

This leaves astronomers in a hard place. The effects are very large. Yet they have to call the supposed impactors very small else they would leave evidence. The evidence has not appeared following any of the four seen flashes since 2010 (many more than this are occurring unseen).

The bottom line is that the “flash events” are acting like LIGHTNING and not impactors at all. This is why there is a huge disconnect concerning varying theories.

Electrical voltage discharge on a very large scale is occurring from Jupiter. This is what the visual evidence points to.

How could this be happening?
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-07-2016, 06:06 PM #2
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-07-2016, 06:06 PM)Jupiter Wrote:  https://www.amazon.com/Jovian-Transforma...nav-subnav

They are creating very large light effects yet they are leaving no trace of debris of heat. Of course, no incoming objects have been spotted either.

This leaves astronomers in a hard place. The effects are very large. Yet they have to call the supposed impactors very small else they would leave evidence. The evidence has not appeared following any of the four seen flashes since 2010 (many more than this are occurring unseen).

The bottom line is that the “flash events” are acting like LIGHTNING and not impactors at all. This is why there is a huge disconnect concerning varying theories.

Electrical voltage discharge on a very large scale is occurring from Jupiter. This is what the visual evidence points to.

How could this be happening?

Past insertions of fissile material in the form of fuel pellets aboard NASA’s Galileo mission were made in which the said material was much protected inside various heat shields. This plutonium material did not burn up on entry and managed to drift ever farther down into Jupiter. The equation of state of the clads protecting this fissile material show an increase in melting point when pressure is applied. This is a typical reaction for most elements, by the way.

Iridium and platinum-based clads were used to protect the plutonium and the evidence shows that these elements start with extremely high melting points then increase them as more pressure is applied.

This allows a very deep penetration into Jupiter with the fissile/fissionable plutonium mix to the point of about 90% depth.

At this depth one of the larger of the fuel pellets known as a GPHS-RTG fuel pellet (there were 144 in all on GSC) was able to reach supercritical using the “fractional crit” method. In other words, the density increase of plutonium at this level makes up for the lack in total amount of material to bring the pellet to a state of supercritical. This is a standard practice used to conserve plutonium in weapons and could be used here in the extreme to get a x78 increase in super-criticality from original.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-07-2016, 06:07 PM #3
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Since the Pu-238 oxide mix material is capable of a fissionable nuclear reaction it created a fission to fusion nuclear reaction under immense pressure and inside the correct medium, that is dense hydrogen (much like the Sun’s situation). This is likely now ongoing and sustained at a modest level inside Jupiter.

The pieces of evidence of this incredible event are the thermal convection vent mark known as the “Wesley mark” of 2009 (heat and material vented off from central Jupiter), and subsequent flashes (astronomers are saying 6-7 flashes PER YEAR are now occurring). The flashes are the result of massive electron flows from the hydrogen plasma changing Jupiter from the inside.

This Jovian Transformation theory saves decades of other Jupiter theories regarding the very high unlikelihood of an asteroid hitting Jupiter as well as the other very bad odds of bodies large enough to cause the massive flashes we have been seeing. All of these unlikely “impacts” can now go away. No impacts are occurring.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-07-2016, 06:07 PM #4
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Here’s a website with much more information on this theory: http://jabbingjupiter.com/
07-07-2016, 08:06 PM #5
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,377 Threads:1,483 Joined:Feb 2011
Hey thanks for the free book! thumbsup.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-07-2016, 08:53 PM #6
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-07-2016, 08:06 PM)Octo Wrote:  Hey thanks for the free book! thumbsup.gif

You are welcome!
07-07-2016, 11:07 PM #7
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,590 Threads:1,443 Joined:Feb 2011
(07-07-2016, 06:06 PM)Jupiter Wrote:  https://www.amazon.com/Jovian-Transforma...nav-subnav

They are creating very large light effects yet they are leaving no trace of debris of heat. Of course, no incoming objects have been spotted either.

This leaves astronomers in a hard place. The effects are very large. Yet they have to call the supposed impactors very small else they would leave evidence. The evidence has not appeared following any of the four seen flashes since 2010 (many more than this are occurring unseen).

The bottom line is that the “flash events” are acting like LIGHTNING and not impactors at all. This is why there is a huge disconnect concerning varying theories.

Electrical voltage discharge on a very large scale is occurring from Jupiter. This is what the visual evidence points to.

How could this be happening?

Jupiter is fascinating. The Electric Universe theory may offer some explanations. Lightning, St Elmo's Fire, plasma, ionized gases all react to electromagnetic fields.
Jupiter's magnetosphere is the largest and most powerful of any planetary magnetosphere in the Solar System, and by volume the largest known continuous structure in the Solar System after the heliosphere.
Lightning on Jupiter is certainly a possibility from my understanding, and thanks for the reading material.

wonder.gif
07-08-2016, 04:18 PM #8
US nli Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-07-2016, 08:53 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(07-07-2016, 08:06 PM)Octo Wrote:  Hey thanks for the free book! thumbsup.gif

You are welcome!

Yes, thanks, it is very interesting.

So, can we assume the flashes may be caused by undetectable impacts hitting an existing electrical storm?
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-09-2016, 05:16 PM #9
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-08-2016, 04:18 PM)US nli Wrote:  
(07-07-2016, 08:53 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(07-07-2016, 08:06 PM)Octo Wrote:  Hey thanks for the free book! thumbsup.gif

You are welcome!

Yes, thanks, it is very interesting.

So, can we assume the flashes may be caused by undetectable impacts hitting an existing electrical storm?

The cause is much deeper than that. The evidence taken as a whole suggests an internally generated event from the CORE of Jupiter. Here's why: we have the "Wesley mark" in 2009 which was suspicious. The evidence from this mark show abundant silica was present in the debris. This can only come from two places, an asteroid or the core of Jupiter.

Astronomers chose "asteroid" although they did not want to because this ruined decades-old theory about how Jupiter should have swept away ALL asteroids millions of years ago.

This correct assumption is that it's from the core of Jupiter which means there was a massive disturbance there caused by the NASA insertions of a fissionable material. The other evidence suggests the said fuel pellets can indeed cause a nuclear fission reaction that subsequently sets off fusion. Since the mark was long-lasting and so big, this means the reaction below was also sustaining and not just a one-off explosion.

The 2009 mark suggests an initial fusion reaction was venting off and upward hydrogen plasma, carbon, and silica elements from a new central Jupiter nuclear reaction.

The flashes are further evidence: "The complete loss or regaining of all of these electrons during gas to plasma phase changes [of a fusion reaction] would necessitate huge electron current flows; hence the extreme lightning-like effects observed [on Jupiter] as surface flashes.”

My book will always be free to read or download now on my website: http://jabbingjupiter.com/
Look for the link that says "Free book download"......JEC
07-09-2016, 05:34 PM #10
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,188 Threads:429 Joined:Jun 2012
(07-09-2016, 05:16 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(07-08-2016, 04:18 PM)US nli Wrote:  
(07-07-2016, 08:53 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(07-07-2016, 08:06 PM)Octo Wrote:  Hey thanks for the free book! thumbsup.gif

You are welcome!

Yes, thanks, it is very interesting.

So, can we assume the flashes may be caused by undetectable impacts hitting an existing electrical storm?

The cause is much deeper than that. The evidence taken as a whole suggests an internally generated event from the CORE of Jupiter. Here's why: we have the "Wesley mark" in 2009 which was suspicious. The evidence from this mark show abundant silica was present in the debris. This can only come from two places, an asteroid or the core of Jupiter.

Astronomers chose "asteroid" although they did not want to because this ruined decades-old theory about how Jupiter should have swept away ALL asteroids millions of years ago.

This correct assumption is that it's from the core of Jupiter which means there was a massive disturbance there caused by the NASA insertions of a fissionable material. The other evidence suggests the said fuel pellets can indeed cause a nuclear fission reaction that subsequently sets off fusion. Since the mark was long-lasting and so big, this means the reaction below was also sustaining and not just a one-off explosion.

The 2009 mark suggests an initial fusion reaction was venting off and upward hydrogen plasma, carbon, and silica elements from a new central Jupiter nuclear reaction.

The flashes are further evidence: "The complete loss or regaining of all of these electrons during gas to plasma phase changes [of a fusion reaction] would necessitate huge electron current flows; hence the extreme lightning-like effects observed [on Jupiter] as surface flashes.”

My book will always be free to read or download now on my website: http://jabbingjupiter.com/
Look for the link that says "Free book download"......JEC

I am not dismissing any theories.

İmage

İmage (Nature's work of art)

Quote:Jupiter's clouds can swirl rapidly in raised high-pressure storm systems that circle the planet. The above pictured white ovals are located near the Great Red Spot, and have persisted on Jupiter since the 1930s. The Great Red Spot has persisted for at least 300 years. Currently, no one knows why ovals last as long as they do. White ovals are confined to circular belts around Jupiter, but can interact to cause nearby chaotic cloud regions.

https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/media-g...atmosphere
07-09-2016, 07:37 PM #11
Coolchick Member
Posts:5,205 Threads:118 Joined:Mar 2013
that one swirl in the pic reminds me of this


İmage

Just Plain Nuts.
07-09-2016, 07:38 PM #12
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,188 Threads:429 Joined:Jun 2012
Hey, that's a match CC - albiet a blurry one. lol
07-09-2016, 07:54 PM #13
Coolchick Member
Posts:5,205 Threads:118 Joined:Mar 2013
yeah and these ones are in there too

İmage

Just Plain Nuts.
07-10-2016, 02:41 PM #14
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,188 Threads:429 Joined:Jun 2012


Hydrogen fusion?

Quote:Critics, of course, will raise all kinds of objections to this bizarre scenario. Many we have raised ourselves – like the low probability of Galileo’s plutonium even surviving entry – at 108,000 miles per hour! – to reach the necessary “crush depth” for implosion.

A far more serious objection is that the nuclear fuel Galileo carried – plutonium-238 – while ideal as a sustained heat source for making electricity via thermoelectric technology, is NOT traditionally viewed as a fissionable material appropriate for creating nuclear explosions. The plutonium isotope vastly preferred for the original “Fat Man” weapon was plutonium-239 – which, by not emitting an excess of neutrons prior to achieving supercriticality, allowed the construction of an actual implosion plutonium weapon.

http://enterprisemission.com/NukingJupiter.html

You nailed it again CC. lol Here's more for you - Galileo's entry into Jupiter's atmosphere and the eyes of Jupiter.

İmage

İmage
07-10-2016, 04:38 PM #15
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,590 Threads:1,443 Joined:Feb 2011
Going to be fascinating to find out if it's got a solid core. I tend to think it does.

wonder.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com