#Login Register


  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
Home 


This Is How Empires Collapse
04-24-2014, 03:13 PM #16
karutzar Member
Posts:256 Threads:27 Joined:Dec 2012
(04-24-2014, 01:59 PM)Octo Wrote:  I shall not use it with a question again coffeetime.gif chuckle.gif

Octo, correct me if I am wrong, but "shall" always involve question:
Shall I drink a beer? - is question - chuckle.gif very stupid one - I never refuse a beer except when I'm driving. chuckle.gif
I will drink a beer. - is not a question, but statement. The question is what kind of beer - I prefer Koff IV chuckle.gif

Bro Beyond Smolensk, the last russian tzar was weak one, though was not as ugly as Ivan Grozny. You were right of what you said - russians didn't want to kill russians - the tragedy was from inside traitors, most of whom was not even russians by blood. But again all lay on russian psychology - the tzar/messiah will safe us - it is psychology of slaves. And until recently this psychology has been in force (throughout all christian era). Russian monarchy was very merciless one (as all monarchy globally) and all it started in Kiev (hope you know well russian history). Peter the Great hated Moscow and established the capital in Petersburg. The communists (most of whom was not russians at all by blood) return the capital in Moscow. Why? Gregory Klimov give the answer. Gandhi brought freedom to (gypsy) India by the non violence doctrine. Yep, it took him almost all of his life. And guess who killed him? Indian nationalist- fanatic. The same type of russian brain washed fanatics killed the last Romanov. This fanatics are nonhuman two legged entities. And their time/cycle is over. So I think.

You can become a slave only by voluntary consent.
I am highly allergic to circumcised souls and red flags with Venusian star on them.
04-24-2014, 03:29 PM #17
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,618 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
I don't know if shall is used only with a question so I can't correct you on that one even if you're wrong. Ska in Swedish is also correctly written as skall, but it's an older version and the Ls have been dropped more or less. When I was in grade school it would not have been correct to use ska instead of skall even if it's pronounced as ska.
04-24-2014, 04:29 PM #18
Wicked Oblivion Member
Posts:10,778 Threads:720 Joined:Oct 2012
(04-24-2014, 03:13 PM)karutzar Wrote:  
(04-24-2014, 01:59 PM)Octo Wrote:  I shall not use it with a question again coffeetime.gif chuckle.gif

Octo, correct me if I am wrong, but "shall" always involve question:
Shall I drink a beer? - is question - chuckle.gif very stupid one - I never refuse a beer except when I'm driving. chuckle.gif
I will drink a beer. - is not a question, but statement. The question is what kind of beer - I prefer Koff IV chuckle.gif

Bro Beyond Smolensk, the last russian tzar was weak one, though was not as ugly as Ivan Grozny. You were right of what you said - russians didn't want to kill russians - the tragedy was from inside traitors, most of whom was not even russians by blood. But again all lay on russian psychology - the tzar/messiah will safe us - it is psychology of slaves. And until recently this psychology has been in force (throughout all christian era). Russian monarchy was very merciless one (as all monarchy globally) and all it started in Kiev (hope you know well russian history). Peter the Great hated Moscow and established the capital in Petersburg. The communists (most of whom was not russians at all by blood) return the capital in Moscow. Why? Gregory Klimov give the answer. Gandhi brought freedom to (gypsy) India by the non violence doctrine. Yep, it took him almost all of his life. And guess who killed him? Indian nationalist- fanatic. The same type of russian brain washed fanatics killed the last Romanov. This fanatics are nonhuman two legged entities. And their time/cycle is over. So I think.
Ugly or not Nicholas II was able to produce several beautiful although doomed daughters and he was at the time one of the most wealthiest men on the planet with a net worth of around $900,000,000 adjusted to over $13,000,000,000 in current US dollars and one of the most powerful men on the planet as well and for many years his words were supreme law across Russia which was about one tenth of the earths land mass and rather mysteriously knowing how there were no execution photos or films taken to prove they were all really killed i dont totally believe the Romanovs were ever actually murdered especially with all the secretly hidden gold and silver and precious jewels and other uniquely treasured items and icons that only he and his royal family could have led the revolutionaries to obtain for themselves and thats surely one of the most hushed up and suppressed conspiracies of the twentieth century > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_II_of_Russia
04-24-2014, 05:29 PM #19
karutzar Member
Posts:256 Threads:27 Joined:Dec 2012
No offend bro, pls don't understand me wrong - grozny mean ugly and frightful in russian - isn't it?
Yes, Russia was rich, so was the king. What about the people? Was they rich? Should revolution becomes reality if people was rich? How do you think that'll be posible some revolution in Switzerland? Yep, Switzerland is peoples republic, so was ussr.
By the way, do you know that the princes Anastasia Romanova has died in Bulgaria? I know personally the man who knew her and he have write very tiny book called "The secret of Nicolay II". The name of the man is Blagoy Emanuilov. In the book (I have it) the princes Anastasia has live under name Nora and in the book is a lot of pictures of her. I personally believe in this story. From this book is understandable that Nicolay's II gold has been in Paris.

You can become a slave only by voluntary consent.
I am highly allergic to circumcised souls and red flags with Venusian star on them.
04-24-2014, 05:54 PM #20
Wicked Oblivion Member
Posts:10,778 Threads:720 Joined:Oct 2012





Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com