(3 hours ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  

(Yesterday, 11:00 PM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  

(Yesterday, 06:42 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  The news reported Biden has 39% favour in the polls and that was just right after he officially said he was running. Yes, the debate should separate the man from the boy.

But can the debates separate Biden from the girls - very young girls, even prepubescent girls?

The superficial thinking and subjectivity is strong with this one.

There isn't a concerned mother or father who would consider Biden's sexual assaults on prepubescent girls to be superficial. His attacks are on YouTube for all to see. Watch Biden's right hand with the little girl where he creepily climbs down her body to her breast. It's obvious that he has done this before due to how sneaky he is with  this violation. She tries to move away, but he persists. There are other examples, at least one which is worse than this ne.

The Hill quoting Huff Po is the last thing you should use for an informative source.

Perception is 9 tenths of the law.

(Today, 05:53 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Perception is 9 tenths of the law.

Multiple examples of Biden's slowly slipping his hand down into prepubescent girls' chest and even the nipple area. The girls squirm and quickly step away, so their perceptions appear to agree with mine.

(Today, 05:53 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Perception is 9 tenths of the law.

Watch Jeff Sessions swat away Biden's hand. Why would Sessions feel the need to do that? does Biden have a reputation for touching little girls in a criminal manner?

Here is a more explicit video especially starting at 3:09 with three chest feels of very young girls.

Creepy Joe gotta go.

But it gives you an idea of why they want him to run.

(4 hours ago)Kreeper Wrote:  Creepy Joe gotta go.

But it gives you an idea of why they want him to run.

You nailed it, didn't you!