#Login Register


  • 22 Vote(s) - 2.14 Average
Home 


Trump Went Back On His Word ALREADY!
11-23-2016, 04:49 AM #1
Daddysgirl Member
Posts:36 Threads:4 Joined:Dec 2015
Trump won't pursue charges against Hillary Clinton as he promised during his campaign. Instead he is going to help her 'heal'.....

http://nypost.com/2016/11/22/trump-wont-...t-clinton/


What a frickin joke! I knew he was too good to be true.....
11-23-2016, 10:32 AM #2
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:40,943 Threads:1,563 Joined:Feb 2011
He's not even the prez yet 13.gif
11-23-2016, 12:19 PM #3
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,984 Threads:754 Joined:Feb 2011
I didn't expect him to go after her. I've said all along that she is protected.

What bothers me is that he is even talking to people like Romney. So much for draining the swamp. Unfortunately, the system is set up so that the swamp can never be drained. It's why election years are staggered. People like Rand Paul have already said they would vote no for certain choices Trump makes for his cabinet.

The balance of power in the Senate is close enough that Trump will need all of the Republicans for some actions and all of the Republicans and eight of the Democrats for others. The Republicans are already holding that over his head and will continue to do so because they don't face re-election for four years. The only thing he will accomplish will be through Executive Orders.

What politics from both sides wants to teach us is that things are never complex. If you have your little package and something doesn't fit into that package, You don't know what to make of it so you want to dismiss it or then you will have to do the work of reconsidering your assumptions. - Michael Malice
11-23-2016, 12:56 PM #4
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,185 Threads:1,485 Joined:Feb 2011
It's not the executive branch that goes after people anyway.
That's up to the FBI and DOJ.
As far as Romney... I had not read that he got any job.
After that meeting with Trump he looked butthurt to me.

wonder.gif

11-23-2016, 01:24 PM #5
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,984 Threads:754 Joined:Feb 2011
Butt hurt?

Think he got the Trump Stump?

chuckle.gif

What politics from both sides wants to teach us is that things are never complex. If you have your little package and something doesn't fit into that package, You don't know what to make of it so you want to dismiss it or then you will have to do the work of reconsidering your assumptions. - Michael Malice
11-23-2016, 01:25 PM #6
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:40,943 Threads:1,563 Joined:Feb 2011
Ouch! scream.gif
11-23-2016, 01:39 PM #7
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,185 Threads:1,485 Joined:Feb 2011
(11-23-2016, 01:24 PM)Kreeper Wrote:  Butt hurt?

Think he got the Trump Stump?

chuckle.gif

İmage

A picture is worth a thousand words.

wonder.gif

11-23-2016, 02:10 PM #8
DaJavoo If looks could kilt
Posts:1,767 Threads:45 Joined:Mar 2011
(11-23-2016, 12:56 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  It's not the executive branch that goes after people anyway.
That's up to the FBI and DOJ.
As far as Romney... I had not read that he got any job.
After that meeting with Trump he looked butthurt to me.

Exactly. The investigations into the Clinton Syndicate are just warming up.

Trump is a master of marketing (and deal making) He is currently marshalling the unfriendly 'friendly' forces for a unified front. He is entering office with HIGHER PUBLIC PERCEPTION points than any recent president, including Reagan.

Daddy is in the house, gang.
11-23-2016, 02:42 PM #9
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,185 Threads:1,485 Joined:Feb 2011
İmage

I have a sneaking suspicion things are gonna' be real interesting.

wonder.gif

Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-23-2016, 05:02 PM #10
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
waaaaay too early in the game to make any generalizations.

I have faith in Trump.
Random German Guy Show this Post
11-23-2016, 05:54 PM #11
Random German Guy Incognito Anonymous
 
(11-23-2016, 05:02 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  waaaaay too early in the game to make any generalizations.

I have faith in Trump.

It can't get any worse than the last admin.
11-24-2016, 01:59 PM #12
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,984 Threads:754 Joined:Feb 2011
(11-23-2016, 05:54 PM)Random German Guy Wrote:  
(11-23-2016, 05:02 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  waaaaay too early in the game to make any generalizations.

I have faith in Trump.

It can't get any worse than the last admin.

It can and it almost did. Thank god she lost...

damned.gif

What politics from both sides wants to teach us is that things are never complex. If you have your little package and something doesn't fit into that package, You don't know what to make of it so you want to dismiss it or then you will have to do the work of reconsidering your assumptions. - Michael Malice
11-24-2016, 02:13 PM #13
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,185 Threads:1,485 Joined:Feb 2011
(11-24-2016, 01:59 PM)Kreeper Wrote:  
(11-23-2016, 05:54 PM)Random German Guy Wrote:  
(11-23-2016, 05:02 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  waaaaay too early in the game to make any generalizations.

I have faith in Trump.

It can't get any worse than the last admin.

It can and it almost did. Thank god she lost...

damned.gif

According to Huffpo she could still easily win. *sigh* bored.gif

wonder.gif

11-24-2016, 09:18 PM #14
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,984 Threads:754 Joined:Feb 2011
(11-24-2016, 02:13 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  
(11-24-2016, 01:59 PM)Kreeper Wrote:  
(11-23-2016, 05:54 PM)Random German Guy Wrote:  
(11-23-2016, 05:02 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  waaaaay too early in the game to make any generalizations.

I have faith in Trump.

It can't get any worse than the last admin.

It can and it almost did. Thank god she lost...

damned.gif

According to Huffpo she could still easily win. *sigh* bored.gif

Take is with a grain of salt. I'm pretty sure they are babbling about the cry for a recount in Wisconsin, Michigan and some other state. That was based on some computer geeks saying that there were irregularities in results because Trump did 7% better in the places where electronic voting machines were used. There are a few problems with this.

The places in Wisconsin where she did better, urban areas like Milwaukee and Madison, used paper ballots. The places that used electronic machines were the rest of the state outside of urban areas and had a higher percentage of Trump voters.

This holds true across the country. Look at a US election results by county map and tell me what you see. All she won was major urban areas and areas with high minority concentrations.

There is a second problem with the theory of Trump supporters hacking the electronic voting machines and rigging the election in those states.

Michigan doesn't use electronic voting machines. They are 100% paper ballots and optical scanners and their system does not connect to the internet at any point.

Besides, they have already had a recount in Michigan and he still won.

Personally, I feel that if they are going to investigate voting machines in any state they should investigate EVERY machine in EVERY state. Let's see what she, and her supporters, feel about that.

What politics from both sides wants to teach us is that things are never complex. If you have your little package and something doesn't fit into that package, You don't know what to make of it so you want to dismiss it or then you will have to do the work of reconsidering your assumptions. - Michael Malice
11-24-2016, 09:25 PM #15
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,185 Threads:1,485 Joined:Feb 2011
(11-24-2016, 09:18 PM)Kreeper Wrote:  they have already had a recount in Michigan and he still won.

Shhhhhhhh! İmage Don't let Huffpo know 37.gif Our secret.

wonder.gif




Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com