#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime'
01-30-2013, 01:54 AM #1
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,015 Threads:1,474 Joined:Feb 2011
Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.

A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme 'approved by Washington' is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.

Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...Assad.html

coffeetime.gif
JollyRoger Show this Post
01-30-2013, 01:57 AM #2
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
13.gif
01-30-2013, 01:59 AM #3
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,015 Threads:1,474 Joined:Feb 2011
The leaked emails, obtained by a hacker in Germany, feature an exchange (click here for screenshot) between Britam Defence’s Business Development Director David Goulding and the company’s founder Philip Doughty;

Phil

We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.

We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have. They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.

Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?

Kind regards
David

http://www.infowars.com/hack-reveals-was...-in-syria/

01-30-2013, 02:05 AM #4
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,393 Threads:1,439 Joined:Feb 2011
I wish I could say something like what a surprise... but I can't.
I wish I could say someone will be held accountable... but they wont.

wonder.gif
01-30-2013, 03:21 AM #5
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
(01-30-2013, 01:57 AM)JollyRoger Wrote:  13.gif


iagree.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
01-30-2013, 03:51 AM #6
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Always good that the government covers all angels
Not a bad thing just the way it is
As im sure Syria and Russia had there ideas and thoughts
But that's not government emails but im sure they played out scenario and be disappointed in them if they didn't lmao.gif
01-30-2013, 04:07 AM #7
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
The MSM has been caught too often faking videos on Assad's 'tyranny' of Syrians.
01-30-2013, 04:27 AM #8
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,015 Threads:1,474 Joined:Feb 2011
Old tricks of the trade...
01-30-2013, 06:45 AM #9
オタマジャクシ Member
Posts:1,310 Threads:32 Joined:Nov 2012
(01-30-2013, 04:27 AM)Octo Wrote:  Old tricks of the trade...



Well, it doesn't make sense for the US to back the use of chemical weapons and take credit for it. That would undermine the US position and moral authority.

It makes a lot more sense to blame Assad. Good plan!

Are you sure the Obama administration is doing this??? They have a reputation of not being very clever or cunning. Some deception and strategy in foreign policy would be a new and welcome development.
01-30-2013, 01:14 PM #10
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,015 Threads:1,474 Joined:Feb 2011
(01-30-2013, 06:45 AM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  
(01-30-2013, 04:27 AM)Octo Wrote:  Old tricks of the trade...



Well, it doesn't make sense for the US to back the use of chemical weapons and take credit for it. That would undermine the US position and moral authority.

It makes a lot more sense to blame Assad. Good plan!

Are you sure the Obama administration is doing this??? They have a reputation of not being very clever or cunning. Some deception and strategy in foreign policy would be a new and welcome development.


Any administration is just puppetry, they don't need to be clever or cunning to follow the orders of their masters.
01-30-2013, 05:23 PM #11
オタマジャクシ Member
Posts:1,310 Threads:32 Joined:Nov 2012
(01-30-2013, 01:14 PM)Octo Wrote:  
(01-30-2013, 06:45 AM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  
(01-30-2013, 04:27 AM)Octo Wrote:  Old tricks of the trade...



Well, it doesn't make sense for the US to back the use of chemical weapons and take credit for it. That would undermine the US position and moral authority.

It makes a lot more sense to blame Assad. Good plan!

Are you sure the Obama administration is doing this??? They have a reputation of not being very clever or cunning. Some deception and strategy in foreign policy would be a new and welcome development.


Any administration is just puppetry, they don't need to be clever or cunning to follow the orders of their masters.


Yeah, I know - but the Obama administration has a track record of being pathetically inept and clumsy in their foreign policy. If they were actually ept for a change it would be a big improvement.
01-30-2013, 05:43 PM #12
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,393 Threads:1,439 Joined:Feb 2011
As Hillary would say, what's it matter? chuckle.gif

wonder.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com