#Login Register


  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
Home 


US Flu Deaths Are Actually Declining With Last Season Lowest Yet
06-14-2019, 12:41 AM #1
RiskyRob Master Blaster
Posts:485 Threads:67 Joined:Apr 2018
We were warned last year on Kritterbox that we would never see another Christmas because 5G radio signals would trigger a flu and cause millions of US flu deaths.

The opposite has in fact happened. In the 2018-19 the percentage of all deaths due to pneumonia and influenza continued to decline, and was the lowest in five years. Here is the CDC report to prove this.

https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/mortality.html
Below Average Genius Show this Post
06-14-2019, 05:26 AM #2
Below Average Genius Incognito Anonymous
 
(4 hours ago)RiskyRob Wrote:  We were warned last year on Kritterbox that we would never see another Christmas because 5G radio signals would trigger a flu and cause millions of US flu deaths.

The opposite has in fact happened. In the 2018-19 the percentage of all deaths due to pneumonia and influenza continued to decline, and was the lowest in five years. Here is the CDC report to prove this.

https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/mortality.html

With this post of yours it's clear your attempts to deceive are intentional. You were informed that percents are not the same as deaths. I'm copying and pasting the prvious crushing refutation since you are unwilling to deal wit facts, onl;y your hurt feelings....

Wrong! Wrong, and Wrong! You linked to percentages, not the actual numbers!! Death rates from all causes have climbed during the last three years because EMFs kill in a variety of ways shortening lifespans. IOW, you have further proved my points because EMFs hurt us in so many serious ways.

Three of the last four years have been the highest total number of flu deaths in the last 40 years or more.

2015: 64,000
2018: 80,000
2019: 61,200 reported before the CDC stopped reporting flu deaths for this year.


My predictions were based on the timings of the rollouts which I explained numerous times before the rollouts began. The telecom companies over promised and delayed rollouts, but the flu pattern shifted dramatically in the cities when 5G was rolled out.

What had been a mild season until December took off and became the longest flu season on record where it exceeded the baseline,.

Because you keep making the same false assertions about what I have said, it means you have zero concern about the truth and are only concerned about your tattered pride. You might want to seek professional help along with a confession box to repent the falsehoods you have put forth.
06-14-2019, 09:05 AM #3
RiskyRob Master Blaster
Posts:485 Threads:67 Joined:Apr 2018
(3 hours ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  2019: 61,200 reported before the CDC stopped reporting flu deaths for this year. [/size]

Again, you are misrepresenting and fear-mongering.

The actual figure for 2018-2019 is a range between 36,400 – 61,200. Not 61,200

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/pre...imates.htm

You not only owe everyone an apology, but you need to get off the internet.
06-14-2019, 09:05 AM #4
RiskyRob Master Blaster
Posts:485 Threads:67 Joined:Apr 2018
(3 hours ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  2019: 61,200 reported before the CDC stopped reporting flu deaths for this year. [/size]

Again, you are misrepresenting and fear-mongering.

The actual figure for 2018-2019 is a range between 36,400 – 61,200. Not 61,200

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/pre...imates.htm

You not only owe everyone an apology, but you need to get off the internet.
Below Average Genius Show this Post
06-14-2019, 05:31 PM #5
Below Average Genius Incognito Anonymous
 
(8 hours ago)RiskyRob Wrote:  
(Today, 05:26 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  2019: 61,200 reported before the CDC stopped reporting flu deaths for this year. [/size]

Again, you are misrepresenting and fear-mongering.

The actual figure for 2018-2019 is a range between 36,400 – 61,200. Not 61,200

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/pre...imates.htm

You not only owe everyone an apology, but you need to get off the internet.

Yet, again more statistical deceptions on your part. I compared apples with apples. Each year's death toll is the high end to the range. the high end is more accurate because many people don't go to the doctor for their flu and they die anyway. No autopsy is done in 99% of the cases due to the high expense.

This means the number could be higher than the high estimates made by the CDC.

By the way did you apologize for calling me mentally ill when it was you who used the wrong chart? Did you also acknowledge that the reason your chart was so terribly wrong is that deaths from all causes are consistently climbing! No of course you didn't. You continue to look for the least bit of error I might make, telling untruths in the process, while altogether refusing to acknowledge the overwhelming correctness of my predictions and the reasons for them.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
06-14-2019, 10:40 PM #6
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(Today, 09:05 AM)RiskyRob Wrote:  
(Today, 05:26 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  2019: 61,200 reported before the CDC stopped reporting flu deaths for this year. [/size]

Again, you are misrepresenting and fear-mongering.

The actual figure for 2018-2019 is a range between 36,400 – 61,200. Not 61,200

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/pre...imates.htm

You not only owe everyone an apology, but you need to get off the internet.
^This..
Below Average Genius Show this Post
06-14-2019, 11:11 PM #7
Below Average Genius Incognito Anonymous
 
(31 minutes ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(Today, 09:05 AM)RiskyRob Wrote:  
(Today, 05:26 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  2019: 61,200 reported before the CDC stopped reporting flu deaths for this year. [/size]

Again, you are misrepresenting and fear-mongering.

The actual figure for 2018-2019 is a range between 36,400 – 61,200. Not 61,200

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/pre...imates.htm

You not only owe everyone an apology, but you need to get off the internet.
^This..

Not this - as was fully explained above. I suspect the anonymous kritter is a cloaked IP. Who else would attempt to back what is obviously wrong data and incorrect conclusions.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
06-14-2019, 11:16 PM #8
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(4 minutes ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(35 minutes ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(Today, 09:05 AM)RiskyRob Wrote:  
(Today, 05:26 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  2019: 61,200 reported before the CDC stopped reporting flu deaths for this year. [/size]

Again, you are misrepresenting and fear-mongering.

The actual figure for 2018-2019 is a range between 36,400 – 61,200. Not 61,200

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/pre...imates.htm

You not only owe everyone an apology, but you need to get off the internet.
^This..

Not this - as was fully explained above. I suspect the anonymous kritter is a cloaked IP. Who else would attempt to back what is obviously wrong data and incorrect conclusions.

Your comment above makes no sense at all;secondly it is you who consistently puts wrong data and incorrect conclusions.
Below Average Genius Show this Post
06-15-2019, 12:32 AM #9
Below Average Genius Incognito Anonymous
 
(1 hour ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(1 hour ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(1 hour ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(Yesterday, 09:05 AM)RiskyRob Wrote:  
(Yesterday, 05:26 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  2019: 61,200 reported before the CDC stopped reporting flu deaths for this year. [/size]

Again, you are misrepresenting and fear-mongering.

The actual figure for 2018-2019 is a range between 36,400 – 61,200. Not 61,200

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/pre...imates.htm

You not only owe everyone an apology, but you need to get off the internet.
^This..

Not this - as was fully explained above. I suspect the anonymous kritter is a cloaked IP. Who else would attempt to back what is obviously wrong data and incorrect conclusions.

Your comment above makes no sense at all;secondly it is you who consistently puts wrong data and incorrect conclusions.

I knew it was you, Risky Bob, still hiding behind your fake IP.

What part of "As fully explained above" did you not understand, Bob?

You tried to pass off percentages as being the same thing as an actual body count. That's a monumental error, Bob. you tried it twice in fact, including after your error was explained to you. IOW, you intentionally persisted with deceptive data.

When that effort of yours failed, you took another stab, and failed again.

Since that failed, you're switching your IP to pretend you're someone else, That transparent fakery has failed, too.

Your last attempt is to pretend you don't understand the clear refutation.

What will you do next, Bob? Maybe you could hire someone to role play further.
06-15-2019, 01:28 AM #10
RiskyRob Master Blaster
Posts:485 Threads:67 Joined:Apr 2018
(1 hour ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(3 hours ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(3 hours ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(3 hours ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(Yesterday, 09:05 AM)RiskyRob Wrote:  Again, you are misrepresenting and fear-mongering.

The actual figure for 2018-2019 is a range between 36,400 – 61,200. Not 61,200

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/pre...imates.htm

You not only owe everyone an apology, but you need to get off the internet.
^This..

Not this - as was fully explained above. I suspect the anonymous kritter is a cloaked IP. Who else would attempt to back what is obviously wrong data and incorrect conclusions.

Your comment above makes no sense at all;secondly it is you who consistently puts wrong data and incorrect conclusions.

I knew it was you, Risky Bob, still hiding behind your fake IP.

What part of "As fully explained above" did you not understand, Bob?

You tried to pass off percentages as being the same thing as an actual body count. That's a monumental error, Bob. you tried it twice in fact, including after your error was explained to you. IOW, you intentionally persisted with deceptive data.

When that effort of yours failed, you took another stab, and failed again.

Since that failed, you're switching your IP to pretend you're someone else, That transparent fakery has failed, too.

Your last attempt is to pretend you don't understand the clear refutation.

What will you do next, Bob? Maybe you could hire someone to role play further.

It wasn't me. Everyone here is tired of your delusional bullshit.
Below Average Genius Show this Post
06-15-2019, 08:21 AM #11
Below Average Genius Incognito Anonymous
 
(6 hours ago)RiskyRob Wrote:  
(7 hours ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(9 hours ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(9 hours ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(9 hours ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  ^This..

Not this - as was fully explained above. I suspect the anonymous kritter is a cloaked IP. Who else would attempt to back what is obviously wrong data and incorrect conclusions.

Your comment above makes no sense at all;secondly it is you who consistently puts wrong data and incorrect conclusions.

I knew it was you, Risky Bob, still hiding behind your fake IP.

What part of "As fully explained above" did you not understand, Bob?

You tried to pass off percentages as being the same thing as an actual body count. That's a monumental error, Bob. you tried it twice in fact, including after your error was explained to you. IOW, you intentionally persisted with deceptive data.

When that effort of yours failed, you took another stab, and failed again.

Since that failed, you're switching your IP to pretend you're someone else, That transparent fakery has failed, too.

Your last attempt is to pretend you don't understand the clear refutation.

What will you do next, Bob? Maybe you could hire someone to role play further.

It wasn't me. Everyone here is tired of your delusional bullshit.

You remind me of the adulterous husband who gets caught in bed by his wife. He pleads, "It's not me!" and runs out of the room.

P.S. You're boring me.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
06-15-2019, 08:44 AM #12
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Quote:It wasn't me. Everyone here is tired of your delusional bullshit.
It wasn't him............&^This



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com