#Login Register


  • 8 Vote(s) - 3 Average
Home 


US LOCKED AND LOADED FOR AIR-SEA STRIKES AGAINST QAFFAFI'S FORCES!
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-17-2011, 02:23 PM #1
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
"sources say the White House is weighing the option of US aerial strikes for halting Qaddafi's march on Benghazi, Libya's second largest city and the primary rebel stronghold. The point of this action would be less to preserve rebel control of the city and more to keep Qaddafi from proclaiming his victory over the opposition to his rule and its foreign champions.
Another part of the plan under consideration in Washington would entail strikes against Qaddafi's government and military centers in Tripoli, the capital."

http://www.debka.com/article/20772/

WHILE OUR ATTENTION IS ELSEWHERE OUR LEADERS ARE PLANNING ANOTHER WAR. PIN PLEASE THIS IS IMPORTANT!
03-17-2011, 02:42 PM #2
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:13,525 Threads:1,259 Joined:Feb 2011
iagree.gif I'd like to see a more reliable source than Debka though, they're notorious for misleading and they always have an agenda. Also, apparently Israel sent 50,000 troops to help Gaddafi and a US intervention on behalf of the rebels would directly counter Tel Aviv. But president pussy does what he's told. Very interesting...
03-17-2011, 02:46 PM #3
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,653 Threads:1,568 Joined:Feb 2011
damned.gif Nice find AC! hi5.gif Same old MO again and again. Distraction, mobilization and military action.
The PTB are on the one hand, pretending to be concerned about radiation levels and peoples lives, while on the other; plans are being drawn up to kill people.

Of course that doesn't count in some circles as Muzzies and Libyans are not considered real people, just obstacles to be overcome in a quest for resources. gaah.gif

edit: not certain about debka, cant say as I've run across them as a source for anything before now. Whats the scoop with them Shadow? dunno.gif

wonder.gif
03-17-2011, 02:50 PM #4
Upāsaka Member
Posts:1,448 Threads:260 Joined:Feb 2011
Don't see it happening anytime soon. The most hawkish have been France and the UK. I have no doubt the rebels are already being provided with weapons, on the ground. The US, will get involved when the NATO/UN have agreement. Unless they change tack and go all "Team America - ğck yeah" mode against Libya.

Meanwhile in Bahrain, saudi & Bahrain troops and massacring protesters in the streets have been killing doctors and medics have taken control of the hospitals where supplies are starting to run low.
03-17-2011, 03:12 PM #5
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:13,525 Threads:1,259 Joined:Feb 2011
(03-17-2011, 02:50 PM)Prometheus Wrote:  Meanwhile in Bahrain, saudi & Bahrain troops and massacring protesters in the streets have been killing doctors and medics have taken control of the hospitals where supplies are starting to run low.

I've been watching that too. The US is backing Saudi intervention in Bahrain.

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23739

wtf2.gif
03-17-2011, 03:30 PM #6
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,653 Threads:1,568 Joined:Feb 2011
Certainly the US is going to back anything that facilitates conflict with Iran. They, due to large oil reserves are becoming enemy de jure. Unlike al-Qaeda however the government there is real and somewhat adversarial, which presents a host of real problems. The the US does not have the money or the stomach for another endless war in the region.
If all the money that was spent post 911 to secure oil in the region had been spent on development of alternative fuel sources, we would not have these problems we now face.

wonder.gif
03-17-2011, 03:50 PM #7
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:13,525 Threads:1,259 Joined:Feb 2011
iagree.gif what's been spent, estimated 2 trillion, if oil was $80/bbl the US could have bought 25 billion bbls of oil. Of course oil was $25/bbl when Bush attacked Afghanistan and Iraq. But Halliburton wouldn't be so rich and Cheney couldn't have that. I think the warmongers vastly inflate their competence. Well obviously they do.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-17-2011, 03:58 PM #8
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
The entire US and the economy is based on the death of millions of people worldwide, just so people can buy plastic Chinese made shït at wall mart and msg laden gmo frankenfood. The same thing will happen to the consumers in the end as happened to all those that died so people can live this artificial superficial unsustainable lifestyle.
It's just about to end.
03-17-2011, 04:36 PM #9
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:13,525 Threads:1,259 Joined:Feb 2011
Oh jeez. I just realized, Libya has a foreign debt load of 11%, that's pretty damn low. Would it be possible the banksters (as they've been known to do) are driving Libya into civil war, selling weapons and backing BOTH sides to drive the country into debt with their oil reserves as collateral?
03-17-2011, 04:43 PM #10
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,653 Threads:1,568 Joined:Feb 2011
yay.gif We have a winner! Ding ding ding ding! İmage

wonder.gif
03-17-2011, 04:51 PM #11
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:13,525 Threads:1,259 Joined:Feb 2011
Quote:Their objective isn't to control the conflict, it's to control the debt the conflict produces



03-17-2011, 04:52 PM #12
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:13,525 Threads:1,259 Joined:Feb 2011
sad2.gif It would certainly explain why Israel is backing Gaddafi and the US is backing the rebels wouldn't it?
03-17-2011, 04:55 PM #13
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,653 Threads:1,568 Joined:Feb 2011
The real value of a conflict is the debt it produces. You control the debt, you control everything.

Thats the banking industry policy and has been for as long as I have been alive. Yes it makes total sense in terms of why Israel is backing Gaddafi and the US is backing the rebels.

Tis win win

wonder.gif
03-17-2011, 05:02 PM #14
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,056 Threads:1,477 Joined:Feb 2011
(03-17-2011, 04:52 PM)Shadow Wrote:  sad2.gif It would certainly explain why Israel is backing Gaddafi and the US is backing the rebels wouldn't it?

Sounds like a damned plausible explanation to me gaah.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-17-2011, 05:18 PM #15
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
beercheer.gif HEY THANKS FOR THE PIN! I'VE TRIED FOR YEARS AT OTHER FORUMS AND THE MORE IMPORTANT MY STUFF WAS THE MORE IT GOT IGNORED. MY FIRST POST WAS PINNED SO I'M BATTING A THOUSAND chuckle.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com