#Login Register


  • 14 Vote(s) - 3.21 Average
Home 


Watch and Learn
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-26-2016, 10:17 PM #16
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(03-26-2016, 10:10 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(03-26-2016, 09:21 PM)Kreeper Wrote:  
(03-26-2016, 06:47 PM)AC Wrote:  
(03-26-2016, 06:44 PM)Kreeper Wrote:  BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH


And you posted two fail links.



The URL:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwZiQyFaAs0



This is only the third time that I've posted here, since it's inception

I meant in your op. You posted two links and neither one worked.

I just don't see why people make such a big deal out of circumcision. I'm circumcised. I don't remember it happening. It hasn't ruined my life. Frankly, I'm glad I am. I would rather be circumcised than have a penis that looks like a shrew in a skin parka.

Just sayin...

coffeetime.gif



Intact penis looks better, no question. The fact that the image of a denuded, permanently exposed glans, with a ring-scar encircling it, is emblazoned-upon the minds of the US populace, by no means indicates that people from the rest of the industrialized 1st world agree with you. It's as if the scar is so obvious and that it's always been there since one can remember, is the reason, imo.. that a lot of men don't even know that they have a scar, what was connected from there, how it felt, how it functioned.. etc.. etc.

Honestly, an innervated, utilitarian hoody, which contains 20,000 plus Meisner Corpuscles is far preferable, than to have, what is incomparably the most erogenous part cut off of your body. An erect intact penis, with prepuce partially or fully retracted, is what a normal penis, in aroused state is supposed to look like.

The damage is horrid, but you're simply used to it and you have no frame of reference. That statement is not meant to be hurtful, btw and you personally had no choice as to whether you would want to retain your own prepuce or discard it for very psycho-social, culturally-conformist types of pressures. There is no way to explain to you how grateful I am, that my mother and father didn't mutilate me and left me whole. Honestly though, if I had to make what is really an incomparable comparison, some thing like 90% of all the sensitivity comes from the substructures of my prepuce, and probably the prepuces of all homo sapiens sapiens, for that matter. You would have yours too, if your parents hadn't consented to subject you to that.. probably out of ignorance or because they were psychologically accosted
by the 'Murican circ zombie staff of some 'Murican hospital. Where are you from, btw?


Check out the vid and learn something. It's very important info, if you plan on havin children, that is if you haven't already.




http://www.circumcisionharm.org/gallery%20intact.htm

http://www.circumcisionharm.org/gallery1.htm


To clarify what I meant to state.

Ring-scar on shaft, below the glans. The area between the scar and the coronal sulcus(edge) of the glans has been reported as being the most sensitive place on a cut man. That's because there is a varying remnant of the frenular delta remaning. Depending on how much and how 'tight' one was cut usually determines how much sensation a cut man will feel and usually will correlate with an overall more complications from his circumcision as he ages.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-26-2016, 10:33 PM #17
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2008/1...-and-fema/


[
Frank OHara

November 13, 2008
I find it telling that the name of this blog is “Denialism Blog” when that is exactly what is going on here. I also find it disturbing that it is written by a proclaimed “medical student.” The ignorance of the issue is telling.

There is the usual claim that male and female circumcision have no correlations but this is certainly not true. The first incorrect assumption is that the glans clitoris and the glans penis are identical structures in both form and function only having a difference in size. This is certainly not true.

Granted, they both spring from the genital tubercle which is identical up to about 8 weeks gestation but from that point on, they follow different paths of development and have different functions.

In the female, the glans clitoris develops into primarily a tactile sensory organ and in the male, it develops into a pressure receptor. The pressure receptor in the female is the G-Spot. Casual observation will substantiate this. During coitus, the pressure sensory organs of both are in contact.

The tactile sensory organ in the male is the frenulum. As in female circumcision, this is removed/disabled during circumcision.

The female has the vaginal sphincter as a stretch receptor organ. In the male, this stretch receptor is in the frenulum and the preputial sphincter both of which are removed during circumcision.

Likewise, male circumcision removes the protection from the penis that the labia provide to the clitoris. That protection keeps both organs protected from abrasive assault and keeps both moist and sensitive.

Legitimately comparing the two, male circumcision is the removal of the functional equivalent of the female clitoris, the clitoral hood, the labia majora and labia minora and the vaginal sphincter. This is based on function, not physical appearance.

Denialists will assert that male circumcision is a sum zero procedure or even that it has benefits to the man. That is certainly not true. Research (E.O. Laumann, 1998 and C.B. Bleustein) shows that circumcised men reach impotency years before men who are not circumcised. Anecdotal evidence supports this research. American men consume 54% of the world’s production of vïäģřå. Malaysian men (Muslim and circumcised) are the world’s highest per capita consumers of vïäģřå type products and Israel (Jewish and circumcised) is the world’s leading counterfeiter of vïäģřå.

Additionally, male circumcision has been implicated in female arousal disorder, a disorder that can render post menopausal women unable to engage in sexual intercourse due to the pain associated with penetration.

Male circumcision has also been shown to be associated with premature ejaculation, certainly the bain of many men. Premature ejaculation is strongly assocated with circumcision. The mechanics of this effect is a tight skin sleeve in men that holds the penile shaft against the prostate gland and with the undulations of sexual intercourse over stimulating the prostate to ejaculation before its time.

Denialists also assert that female circumcision completely removes the capacity to enjoy sex. Research by Hanny Lightfoot-Klein says differently. She found that circumcised women fully enjoy sex and actually have orgasms: http://www.fgmnetwork.org/authors/Lightf...rience.htm

If female circumcision did in fact completely remove the woman’s capacity to enjoy sex, the women would become extremely resistant to sexual intercourse. The birth rate in areas that practice female circumcision refutes this.

It is also false information that female circumcision is male driven. Women in the areas that practice female circumcision overwhelmingly support it by as much as 90%. Indeed, women who immigrate to America and other western nations and are no longer under any pressure to submit themselves or their daughters to the procedure but yet they demand that it be done. Search for “The Seattle Compromise” to see this. It is also common for women to take their daughters back to their home countries to get them circumcised since female circumcision is a felony in all western countries.

The common perception among westerners is that the typical female circumcision is performed by a dusty road with rusty metal or a piece of broken glass by a grizzled old man. The reality is far different. Most female circumcisions are performed in storefront clinical settings by practiced midwife type women. The perception is that male circumcisions are always performed in clinical settings but again, this is just a perception. Tribal male circumcisions in Africa are done in initiation camps or so called circumcision camps. This is the exact same as the perception of female circumcisions and every year, 40 to 100 boys die as a result of these “bush” circumcisions with 150 or more losing their penises and hundreds being hospitalized. The problem has become so prevalent that the Government of South Africa has banned circumcision.

Americans certainly are in denial. Most likely that is because there are so many guilty parties.[/quote]]
03-26-2016, 11:07 PM #18
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,733 Threads:641 Joined:Feb 2011
You seem awful obsessed with the penis.

The only scars I have were cause by braces when I was in high school.

Politicians hide themselves away
They only started the war
Why should they go out to fight?
They leave that role to poor
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-26-2016, 11:27 PM #19
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(03-26-2016, 11:07 PM)Kreeper Wrote:  You seem awful obsessed with the penis.

The only scars I have were cause by braces when I was in high school.


Interesting. Your statement of denial is immediately after I posted a very intelligent post from an intelligent person on the very important topic of male genital mutilation.

Honestly though, would you attempt to stigmatize a woman who was active in informing people about female genital mutilation?

Why is your thinking so debased and puritanical and why are you denying that there is a ring scar, courtesy of the Goldstein Medical Corporation, when there most certainly is?

Would you honestly transfer that denial onto one of your male offspring, so that in your mind, your son can have a 'matching' mutilated penis?

The word mutilation and the reality of what was done to you is a big, bitter pill to swallow, but people really need to stop summarily knife-raping and genitally wounding there male offspring in the US. It's so bizarre, that the victim will defend it and pas the harm on to there own son, as to maintain his own denial.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-26-2016, 11:34 PM #20
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Attempting to stigmatize a woman, who was informing others of the reality of female genital mutilation, by saying that she is obsessed with vulva, is quite absurd. That is how powerful subjective cultural conditioning is.

Willful IGNORE-ance of fact, is juat plain old masochistic and stupid, especially if one truly does love their child.



How 'Americans' were actually mass-brainwashed into mangling their son's genitals, is way beyond me. It's the most routine practice of brutality and harm that we engage in as a society
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-26-2016, 11:36 PM #21
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(03-26-2016, 11:27 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(03-26-2016, 11:07 PM)Kreeper Wrote:  You seem awful obsessed with the penis.

The only scars I have were cause by braces when I was in high school.


Interesting. Your statement of denial is immediately after I posted a very intelligent post from an intelligent person on the very important topic of male genital mutilation.

Honestly though, would you attempt to stigmatize a woman who was active in informing people about female genital mutilation?

Why is your thinking so debased and puritanical and why are you denying that there is a ring scar, courtesy of the Goldstein Medical Corporation, when there most certainly is?

Would you honestly transfer that denial onto one of your male offspring, so that in your mind, your son can have a 'matching' mutilated penis?

The word mutilation and the reality of what was done to you is a big, bitter pill to swallow, but people really need to stop summarily knife-raping and genitally wounding there male offspring in the US. It's so bizarre, that the victim will defend it and pas the harm on to there own son, as to maintain his own denial.



Misspelled 'their'.
03-27-2016, 12:12 AM #22
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,809 Threads:1,471 Joined:Feb 2011
Just wait til White Rabbi finds this thread. He's a circumcision fan.

blonde.gif

eta: Ribbon, not Rabbi
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-27-2016, 01:19 AM #23
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(03-26-2016, 11:34 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  Attempting to stigmatize a woman, who was informing others of the reality of female genital mutilation, by saying that she is obsessed with vulva, is quite absurd. That is how powerful subjective cultural conditioning is.

Willful IGNORE-ance of fact, is juat plain old masochistic and stupid, especially if one truly does love their child.



How 'Americans' were actually mass-brainwashed into mangling their son's genitals, is way beyond me. It's the most routine practice of brutality and harm that we engage in as a society


I also meant it's sadistic, not masochistic if you love your son.

In a way it's masochistic, if one were to see their son as a genetic continuance of themselves.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-27-2016, 01:21 AM #24
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(03-27-2016, 12:12 AM)Octo Wrote:  Just wait til White Rabbi finds this thread. He's a circumcision fan.

blonde.gif

eta: Ribbon, not Rabbi



Of course he is.. ; )
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-27-2016, 01:29 AM #25
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(03-26-2016, 11:07 PM)Kreeper Wrote:  You seem awful obsessed with the penis.

The only scars I have were cause by braces when I was in high school.

Apples to oranges, dude. Your teeth might have needed corrective orthodontics as an adolescent, but the intact penis which Nature gave you did not somehow have a design flaw and require corrective penile surgery performed on it, within days of your birth.

A superstitious belief, that boy's have a design flaw in their genitals and that it needs to subjected to a grueling genital surgery, in order to correct it.



See how inherently sexist that is?
03-27-2016, 03:32 AM #26
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,809 Threads:1,471 Joined:Feb 2011
I have to say that I find the US view on circumcisions rather strange.

How can we possibly change the horrendous practice of genital mutilation, because that's what circumcision is, if it's considered normal and natural in the US, the epitome of western civilization.

Mutilation is mutilation.
03-27-2016, 05:19 AM #27
Jim Rat Member
Posts:144 Threads:1 Joined:Feb 2016
You have to admire the optimism of the Jews. They cut some of it off before they even know how long it's going to be.
03-27-2016, 05:23 AM #28
Jim Rat Member
Posts:144 Threads:1 Joined:Feb 2016
Circumcision was made mandatory in some states in the US because EXPERTS said it was necessary to prevent spread of VD (STD to you kids). Other EXPERTS said it was necessary for cleanliness. Now, EXPERTS on this board are reporting that EXPERTS say it's genital mutilation, and other EXPERTS say its not of any use at all.

It all depends on which EXPERTS you decide to listen to.

Ya pays yer money and ya takes yer chances.
03-27-2016, 08:00 AM #29
AC Incognito Anonymous
 
(03-27-2016, 05:23 AM)Jim Rat Wrote:  Circumcision was made mandatory in some states in the US because EXPERTS said it was necessary to prevent spread of VD (STD to you kids). Other EXPERTS said it was necessary for cleanliness. Now, EXPERTS on this board are reporting that EXPERTS say it's genital mutilation, and other EXPERTS say its not of any use at all.

It all depends on which EXPERTS you decide to listen to.

Ya pays yer money and ya takes yer chances.

Circumcision has never been mandatory in any US state.

The CDC, in the last year, simply parroted the AAP's line on circumcision. The AAP is basically the US trade association of pediatricians.

The overwhelming consensus in western medicine, is that not only is routine infant circumcision unnecessary, it's actually constitutes harm.




Circumcision:
Medical Organization Official Policy Statements

http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/
03-27-2016, 10:39 AM #30
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,345 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
(03-27-2016, 05:19 AM)Jim Rat Wrote:  You have to admire the optimism of the Jews. They cut some of it off before they even know how long it's going to be.

20% off sounds good in theory I guess.

wonder.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com