#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


What Does the Second Amendment Mean Compared to Other Fundamental Rights?
01-18-2013, 12:07 AM #1
Tacolover II Member
Posts:427 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011
01-18-2013, 01:14 AM #2
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,265 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
yup.gif Couldn't be more clear about the second amendment could they?

In truth, it's the one that protects all the others; and don't think that's not why they want it gone.

wonder.gif
01-18-2013, 09:30 AM #3
オタマジャクシ Member
Posts:1,310 Threads:32 Joined:Nov 2012
(01-18-2013, 12:07 AM)Tacolover II Wrote:  I'll drink to that...

http://hollierthanthee.com/2013/01/17/wh...al-rights/


chuck.gif


Taco:

The right to buy weapons is the right to be free.

The founding fathers said "not infringed" and meant it. The "Firearms Control Act of 1934" was the first gun control legislation, to stop the bootleggers. Why were the bootleggers armed - the 18th amendment!

After the 21st Amendment repealed prohibition - the Federal government thought that had been so much fun they would ban drugs.

The Federal government really shouldn't have the power to restrict anything including guns. We need supreme court judges that will pare back authority to constitutional levels, and defund the federal government until the same end has been accomplished.

The federal government shouldn't have the power to restrict guns, drugs, or alcohol.
01-18-2013, 03:01 PM #4
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,578 Threads:633 Joined:Feb 2011
(01-18-2013, 09:30 AM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  
(01-18-2013, 12:07 AM)Tacolover II Wrote:  I'll drink to that...

http://hollierthanthee.com/2013/01/17/wh...al-rights/


chuck.gif


Taco:

The right to buy weapons is the right to be free.

The founding fathers said "not infringed" and meant it. The "Firearms Control Act of 1934" was the first gun control legislation, to stop the bootleggers. Why were the bootleggers armed - the 18th amendment!

After the 21st Amendment repealed prohibition - the Federal government thought that had been so much fun they would ban drugs.

The Federal government really shouldn't have the power to restrict anything including guns. We need supreme court judges that will pare back authority to constitutional levels, and defund the federal government until the same end has been accomplished.

The federal government shouldn't have the power to restrict guns, drugs, or alcohol.



Isn't it rather convenient for them that the Supreme Court justices are selected by them?


coffeetime.gif

I am not your rolling wheels, I am the highway
I am not your carpet ride I am the sky
I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning
I am not your autumn moon, I am the night
The night



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com