#Login Register


  • 13 Vote(s) - 3.38 Average
Home 


White Privilege
11-21-2016, 01:07 PM #91
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:11,161 Threads:752 Joined:Feb 2011
(11-21-2016, 05:54 AM)White Ribbon Wrote:  
(11-21-2016, 04:29 AM)Meow Wrote:  
(11-21-2016, 04:23 AM)White Ribbon Wrote:  
(11-21-2016, 03:47 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(11-21-2016, 03:35 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  Well, keep studying there mister, you'll get your GED. :D

let's take up a collection to get him a car, a job and some pussy

Meow is a closet homo. He just loves to suck C0ck.

yup.gif

oh yes I do. I like to put it up my stinky hole too.

orgazmo3.gif so do I, maybe we should exchange numbers?

blonde.gif

NOW you don't want to sound gay?

blink.gif




chuckle.gif

I am speaking of the life of a man who knows that the world is not given by his fathers, but borrowed from his children; who has undertaken to cherish it and do it no damage, not because he is duty-bound, but because he loves the world and loves his children… - Wendell Berry, 1971
11-21-2016, 02:11 PM #92
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,515 Threads:1,483 Joined:Feb 2011


Appearing on the 9 a.m. ET hour of NBC’s Today on Monday, left-wing actor Donald Sutherland recalled being scolded by actress Helen Mirren on the set of one of his films: “Helen Mirren came up to me on the set and....she said, ‘You are the most privileged person on Earth’....I said, ‘How can you say that?’ And she said, ‘You are a white MALE.’” İmage


Co-host Tamron Hall wondered: “And your reply to that was?” Sutherland proclaimed: “There’s no reply. I was ashamed. I was stunned. And I have gotten more ashamed. It's interesting to realize that you are seen as an integral part of a group that many of whom are mendacious, misogynist, of bigots, racists, and it's appalling.”

İmage

wonder.gif
11-21-2016, 03:04 PM #93
Peesee Incognito Anonymous
 
Sutherland and Mirren are out of touch geriatric hippies.
11-21-2016, 04:26 PM #94
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,004 Threads:444 Joined:Jun 2012
(11-20-2016, 07:08 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  It's the courts job to interpret the law. If you want to spit hairs, there are no Protestant members of the court in a country where Protestants are the majority.
What will the Jews ever know about the struggles of Christians? rofl.gif
As long as we're asking rhetorical questions, why does the White Privilege label discriminate horrifically against poor whites who will never know the “white privilege” they are told that they benefit from?

Exactly, even poor whites have no real representation or understanding in the courts as the white privileged interpret the laws according to their understanding of their world and rigidly apply the law without taking into account changing or extenuating circumstances/societal changes.

From Oliver Twist - when the judge explains to Mr. Bumble that it is expected that his wife acts under his direction:

"If the law supposes that," said Mr. Bumble, squeezing his hat emphatically in both hands, "the law is a ass — a idiot. If that's the eye of the law, the law is a bachelor; and the worst I wish the law is, that his eye may be opened by experience — by experience."

Here's an interesting study:

"Our main results are generally consistent with theories that assume own-race bias.
We find own-race bias in nine of the 12 cases examined (three outcomes, four race
groups). But we also find anomalies in this pattern, and interestingly these anomalies
are all consistent with status and social identity theories. Such theories suggest that
racial differences may evoke different responses in norm-breaking relationships (mi-
norities managing whites, for example) than in relationships that conform to tradi-
tional hierarchies. These theories could thus explain two of our most striking find-
ings. First, when white employees work under other-race managers, they have similar
or even better outcomes than when they work under white managers. But second,
despite this preferential treatment, white employees still appear to harbor the stron-
gest bias against other-race managers".

http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/classes/eco...HR2011.pdf

http://jhr.uwpress.org/content/46/1/26.refs
11-21-2016, 05:36 PM #95
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,515 Threads:1,483 Joined:Feb 2011
(11-21-2016, 04:26 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(11-20-2016, 07:08 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  It's the courts job to interpret the law. If you want to spit hairs, there are no Protestant members of the court in a country where Protestants are the majority.
What will the Jews ever know about the struggles of Christians? rofl.gif
As long as we're asking rhetorical questions, why does the White Privilege label discriminate horrifically against poor whites who will never know the “white privilege” they are told that they benefit from?

Exactly, even poor whites have no real representation or understanding in the courts as the white privileged interpret the laws according to their understanding of their world and rigidly apply the law without taking into account changing or extenuating circumstances/societal changes.

yup.gif Spot on. I'm still hesitant to classify this as white privilege per se or anything other than an unfair system.
From what I've always seen, the more money people make the more detached they become.
Attorneys, judges, and the like make good money regardless of skin color and the discrimination that goes on due to social status affects poor and even middle income whites in much the same way as other minorities.
I think there's far more in the way of elite privilege than white privilege, but that's not what the MSM wants us to think about, as they run cover for that.

wonder.gif
11-21-2016, 06:29 PM #96
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,004 Threads:444 Joined:Jun 2012
(11-21-2016, 05:36 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  
(11-21-2016, 04:26 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(11-20-2016, 07:08 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  It's the courts job to interpret the law. If you want to spit hairs, there are no Protestant members of the court in a country where Protestants are the majority.
What will the Jews ever know about the struggles of Christians? rofl.gif
As long as we're asking rhetorical questions, why does the White Privilege label discriminate horrifically against poor whites who will never know the “white privilege” they are told that they benefit from?

Exactly, even poor whites have no real representation or understanding in the courts as the white privileged interpret the laws according to their understanding of their world and rigidly apply the law without taking into account changing or extenuating circumstances/societal changes.

yup.gif Spot on. I'm still hesitant to classify this as white privilege per se or anything other than an unfair system.
From what I've always seen, the more money people make the more detached they become.
Attorneys, judges, and the like make good money regardless of skin color and the discrimination that goes on due to social status affects poor and even middle income whites in much the same way as other minorities.
I think there's far more in the way of elite privilege than white privilege, but that's not what the MSM wants us to think about, as they run cover for that.

I think it may be racial bias plus status/hierarchial (wealth) bias, so the white privileged could be classified as a combination of both.
11-21-2016, 06:43 PM #97
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,515 Threads:1,483 Joined:Feb 2011
Obama was half white and he did nothing to help the plight of the blacks, so in that case I can see white privilege rear its fugly mc fug face.

wonder.gif
11-21-2016, 06:47 PM #98
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,004 Threads:444 Joined:Jun 2012
(11-21-2016, 06:43 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  Obama was half white and he did nothing to help the plight of the blacks, so in that case I can see white privilege rear its fugly mc fug face.

I think that problem is a deep-rooted cultural bias thing going on (perhaps mixed with economic hardship putting up a big wall - how about free education? would that help?), but I am only guessing because I am not in that situation. How can one man, or a whole nation, begin to formulate a plan of action to effect a change there - is it too far gone now, or can the youth be reached?

My brother's keeper:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/my-brothers-keeper
11-21-2016, 07:16 PM #99
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,515 Threads:1,483 Joined:Feb 2011
Another good initiative that in reality did nothing for the masses. During the Obama administration minorities suffered more than anyone.

The nationalreview described what he did for blacks as "Mainly, it’s been a long ride in reverse."

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/43...dent-obama

He had the chance, and instead bailed out banks and gave trillions to health insurance companies, Iran, destabilized the Middle East...
His priorities were all kinds of corporate TPP fucked up, that's when the think tanks pulled the term white privilege out of their asses, so people wouldn't talk about the fiasco that's gone down the last eight years, and well before that.
We have no right to discuss the failures of even half blacks 'cause WP. chuckle.gif
The whole thing is a joke to me.

wonder.gif
11-21-2016, 07:35 PM #100
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,004 Threads:444 Joined:Jun 2012
Like I said before, it may be too little, too late.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-21-2016, 07:35 PM #101
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
all the race baiting will die down after the inauguration.
11-21-2016, 08:38 PM #102
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,651 Threads:79 Joined:Feb 2011
Mbwahhahhhaaah! lmao.gif

This is Finland, for pete's sake.

Pohjanmaa rose out of the sea.
Absolutely 0, zero, none of the sum total
of foreigners of whatever colour had jack
shit nor diddly squat to do with what it is
today.

Mehh.

The "white guilt" crap does not fly a micro-
millimeter with pétit moi.

However, I've already run into young folks
over here, belonging to old Ostrobothnian
families, who walk around feeling bad about
who they are. For absolutely no other reason
than the relentless MSM propaganda.
F**k the "journalists".
No respect to them.

But yeah, me too - I'm ashamed of Mr Sutherland
being a white male. Just go away, Donald.

smiley-flip-bird.gif
11-21-2016, 08:49 PM #103
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:41,457 Threads:1,558 Joined:Feb 2011
chuckle.gif

Long time no see AS, hope you're doing well hug.gif
11-21-2016, 08:52 PM #104
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,515 Threads:1,483 Joined:Feb 2011
Well, I think Sutherland is just getting up there in age and the cheese slid off the old cracker a bit.

wonder.gif
11-21-2016, 11:05 PM #105
-NIGHTMARE- Member
Posts:1,133 Threads:7 Joined:Aug 2012
(11-21-2016, 08:52 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  Well, I think Sutherland is just getting up there in age and the cheese slid off the old cracker a bit.

chuckle.gif

' Welcome to My Nightmare '



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com