#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Young woman's ovaries destroyed by Gardasil
08-06-2013, 05:28 PM #1
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
Young woman's ovaries destroyed by Gardasil: Merck 'forgot to research' effects of vaccine on female reproduction

As reported by investigative journalist Heidi Stevenson, there are at least two additive ingredients in Gardasil that may be responsible for damaging women's ovaries. These ingredients are polysorbate 80, an emulsifying preservative, and L-histidine, a natural amino acid. Both of these ingredients are, of course, used in processed foods, which millions of people consume every day. But injecting them into the body has a much different biological effect than simply consuming them.

As it turns out, polysorbate 80, which also goes by the names Tween 80, Alkest, and Canarcel, has been shown in studies to damage female reproduction. Not only does this chemical additive greatly accelerate sexual maturation in women, but it also tends to reduce the weight and function of both the ovaries and the uterus. Similarly, L-histidine, when injected into muscle tissue, can cause the body to develop an autoimmune response to the natural substance, which can lead to many of the serious side effects being observed in many young girls who have been jabbed with Gardasil.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/041512_Gardas...z2bCPU6zjN

Unreal. They're pushing to give HPV vaccines to infants now
http://southweb.org/lifewise/the-coming-...o-infants/
08-06-2013, 05:38 PM #2
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,049 Threads:428 Joined:Jun 2012
I am just shaking my head right now, but also thinking that more research and/or trials are needed to perhaps figure out how to make these drugs easier to tolerate and/or pinpoint which people should not be receiving it - and most of all WHEN in one's life should it be given.

The original intent was to prevent these types of diseases later in life and decrease the carrier rate, so in my mind, I think the intent is a worthy one.

Quote:So, you can expect to see a subtle change in how officials refer to HPV vaccines. Instead of discussing cancer, in particular cervical cancer, you’ll likely start hearing references to HPV-related diseases—with an emphasis on the plural. They’re going to sell vaccination of infants as a multi-cancer preventive. Parents who refuse to allow the HPV vaccine, for girls or boys, will be accused of dooming their children to a huge array of cancers. How’s that for a marketing technique?
(From your last link, Shadow).
08-06-2013, 05:43 PM #3
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
The stated intent is a worthy one yes, but it's my belief Merck's true intent is to make money, no corporation is in business for philanthropic purposes. The articles weren't that great, short on the source of their premise these vaccines will be pushed on infants and long on rhetoric lol. But something to watch.
08-06-2013, 05:49 PM #4
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,049 Threads:428 Joined:Jun 2012
With all new approaches to erradicating or managing diseases, they really need longer trials with more diverse populations, in different regions to get a complete understanding.
08-06-2013, 06:32 PM #5
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,992 Threads:1,473 Joined:Feb 2011
Big Pharma is a for profit industry, so long and costly trials is not an attractive option. gaah.gif
08-06-2013, 06:35 PM #6
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,049 Threads:428 Joined:Jun 2012
(08-06-2013, 06:32 PM)Octo Wrote:  Big Pharma is a for profit industry, so long and costly trials is not an attractive option. gaah.gif


Neither is doing nothing to improve their reputation and sales (first priority?). With all the bad press so falls their sales, I would imagine and they can't have that.
08-06-2013, 06:43 PM #7
j browsing Member
Posts:5,158 Threads:1,098 Joined:Jul 2012
and we must also blame the FDA for approving this drug...gaah.gif

"when life gives you lemons..throw them at someone"...Grumpy Cat good.png
08-06-2013, 06:46 PM #8
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,393 Threads:1,439 Joined:Feb 2011
That vaccine has already caused thousands of adverse reactions, including seizures, paralysis, blindness, pancreatitis, speech problems, short-term memory loss, Guillain-Barré syndrome and even death.

wtf2.gif

wonder.gif
08-06-2013, 06:50 PM #9
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,992 Threads:1,473 Joined:Feb 2011
Quote:In the Gardasil clinical trials, 1,115 pregnant women received the HPV vaccine. Overall, the proportions of pregnancies with an adverse outcome were comparable in subjects who received Gardasil and subjects who received placebo.[37] However, the clinical trials had a relatively small sample size. Currently the vaccine is not recommended for pregnant women.[37][38] The long-term effects of the vaccine on fertility are not known, but no effects are anticipated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HPV_vaccine

gaah.gif
08-06-2013, 11:00 PM #10
yankees skier
Posts:5,898 Threads:215 Joined:Feb 2011
gaah.gif

Biere.



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com