#Login Register

  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average

Your eyes, your sinuses, and your mouth are at risk - make that in imminent danger
07-31-2017, 06:55 PM #1
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,257 Threads:197 Joined:Apr 2013
Just as the 5G mmWaves are attracted to rain and plants (due to their moisture content) these waves will be attracted to our 2 to 4 million sweat glands and to our eyes, nose and mouth. This is an exponential increase over what we have been subjected to before with a million units being installed by various companies. What are the health effects on crops? What about our eyes? Sinus problems are one of the leading reasons patients see their doctors. What about the effect there?

Where are the INDEPENDENT studies that PROVE our food supply won't be negatively affected before we jump headlong into this brave new world? Bee keepers have shown if they place a smart phone near their bee hives, the bees stay away. About 40% of our produce relies on bees.

How do thousands of birds not bump into each other when they fly together in mass shifting formations? What happens if their built in electronic sensory abilities are disrupted? What happens to their migration abilities?

Our skin absorbs 85% and we breathe in 15% of the negative ions that we get from the air. Positive ions can be measured from cell towers today. Those positive ions neutralize the negative oxygen ions around them, leaving fewer negative ions to be absorbed by people, plants and animals. A waterfall like Niagara produces 100,000 negative ions per cc per second. An office filled with electronic devices can register at 0 to 50 negative ions per cc. There is a reason why people say they are going to the beach or the forest to "recharge their batteries."

In the photo below the eight plants on the right were not exposed. The seven on the left were exposed. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijfr/2010/836278/fig2/

Here is a link to the study where the photo appears. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijfr/2010/836278/fig2/

These types of findings do not instill confidence. Where is the PROOF that being smothered with 5G energy is safe?

Pray for me. hug.gif

Yeah, Whirling Bliss is a thing. ;-) http://whirlingbliss.com
08-01-2017, 02:12 PM #2
Strigoi Member
Posts:1,126 Threads:65 Joined:Mar 2011
spock.gif This is really kicking this up a few notches.

Un Strigoi printre noi
08-01-2017, 02:21 PM #3
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:9,165 Threads:78 Joined:Feb 2011

Doing what I can.

Ditched the damn cellphone two and a half years ago,
switched off the wi-fi, interwebzing through sturdy,
old-fashioned cable.

Dreading the future a bit, in this particular aspect...
could feel the hint of migraine symptoms and that
'metally fangs' feel in tongue and mouth when out
in the massive throng during the Town Festival... 13.gif

Thankfully, there was good medicine and antidote
about. chuckle.gif
08-01-2017, 04:38 PM #4
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,879 Threads:1,505 Joined:Feb 2011
I have to do some research on the 5G, see what has been studied on the subject in this country
08-01-2017, 06:52 PM #5
Berries Sunshine
Posts:97 Threads:1 Joined:Jan 2017
I'd be mostly worried about my internal organs when it comes to radiation and EM fields. They noticed effects by the 3G net on brainwaves but nothing was done about that: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/brain-w...dy-reveals

Hmmpf, someone beat me to this: http://emfclothing.com/en/home/10-electr...d-net.html
...so much for me getting rich.

I suppose all we can do is hope for the best (radiotrophic offspring).

i kinda like it here on the innernen
08-01-2017, 09:03 PM #6
Posts:937 Threads:7 Joined:Aug 2012
Where, When, and How mmWave is Used in 5G and Beyond


' Welcome to My Nightmare '
08-05-2017, 01:37 AM #7
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,257 Threads:197 Joined:Apr 2013
(08-01-2017, 06:52 PM)Berries Wrote:  I'd be mostly worried about my internal organs when it comes to radiation and EM fields. They noticed effects by the 3G net on brainwaves but nothing was done about that: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/brain-w...dy-reveals

Hmmpf, someone beat me to this: http://emfclothing.com/en/home/10-electr...d-net.html
...so much for me getting rich.

I suppose all we can do is hope for the best (radiotrophic offspring).

Here is one response to the problem of positively charged pollution that can get into our lungs. It can purifiy up to a million cubic feet an hour of dirty air. It does this by producing negative ions. The tower doesn't produce ozone which is a huge plus. We might need a gazillion of these built and installed. It could cost a heap o' money.

The article notes it would take the tower 10 hours to purify Madison Square Garden which is just a city block long and wide. IOW one would be needed on every two blocks if my mental calculation is correct.


Pray for me. hug.gif

Yeah, Whirling Bliss is a thing. ;-) http://whirlingbliss.com
08-06-2017, 03:01 PM #8
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,411 Threads:435 Joined:Jun 2012
Maybe that is why I have more headaches lately, since I went wireless, but I was putting it down to eye strain because I work on a computer all day at work. Although I keep open windows in my home during nice weather, I should also turn on my air cleaner to take down the positive ions and maybe bring plants back into my home as additional air cleaners.


The quickest and most attractive way to boost negative ions in your environment is to install some houseplants. They help to clean the air by taking in carbon dioxide and breathing out fresh oxygen - and therefore many negative ions. However, some plants release higher levels of negative ions than others. The best choices are chrysanthemum, coconut palm, gerbera, spider plant and weeping fig.

A study from Reading University found school children performed better in exams when pot plants were placed in classrooms.

You can also get the same beneficial effects by simply going for a walk and standing near trees or shrubs. This intensifies the benefit of deep breathing. Because plant life gives out oxygen we can benefit from the extra supply given off by our green friends.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/articl...z4oyWhTT4k
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

And the peace lily also purifies air, which a healer friend ask me to temporarily house (that was five years ago blink.gif ).
08-10-2017, 01:11 AM #9
eclipsed Member
Posts:329 Threads:4 Joined:Jan 2017
this was seven years ago:

Wi-Fi Radiation Is Killing Trees, New Study Finds
Yes, trees can bleed, and it's our fault

Studies on the impact of wireless radiation on humans are endlessly inconclusive, but a recent study on the effects of Wi-Fi radiation on trees--yes, trees--indicates that our woody friends may be much more vulnerable than we are. And trees can't even enjoy the benefits of Wi-Fi. It's all very unjust.
08-10-2017, 01:49 AM #10
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:9,165 Threads:78 Joined:Feb 2011


Wish I could afford a good lightning maker machine for my humble home.

08-10-2017, 01:52 AM #11
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:9,165 Threads:78 Joined:Feb 2011
...can't even begin to tell you how much better I feel
(despite the damned genetic condition)
without the fekkin' Nokia.

Best bloody riddance since I threw out the idiot-box, no doubt. cheers.gif




DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com