#Login Register

  • 5 Vote(s) - 4 Average

the BLM is at it again....in Oregon this time
04-15-2015, 01:38 AM #1
jaydoom i am doom
Posts:273 Threads:57 Joined:Mar 2011
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
04-15-2015, 01:43 AM #2
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
(04-15-2015, 01:38 AM)jaydoom Wrote:  http://www.infowars.com/bundy-ranch-type...s-and-blm/

It really is way past time to disband the federal mafia.

They have absolutely proven that they do not possess the integrity or honesty required to govern. In fact -- fedgov, the central banksters and Wall Street have been asset stripping (aka looting) the US openly since 2008. Just like they have been asset stripping the rest of the world since the end of WW2.
04-15-2015, 04:19 AM #3
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,185 Threads:1,485 Joined:Feb 2011
Once the shit gets put in place, it sticks around like herpes.


04-15-2015, 04:57 PM #4
Shadow Incognito Anonymous

04-15-2015, 05:15 PM #5
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,877 Threads:444 Joined:Jun 2012
Quote:“It’s kind of an odd situation,” Jim Wittington of the Medford, Oregon, BLM, said in an interview with WND. “As far as we’re concerned, we had an inspection of the area in January after we realized there were some operations going on there. In March, we issued a notice of noncompliance, primarily because operations that were taking place at the site were not at the level of documentation – the documentation that we had allowed.

“So they have a mining claim, they were doing the kind of activity that probably demands a notice or a plan of operations. And so by virtue of sending them the notice of noncompliance, that gives them a couple of options.

“One, they can work to get into compliance and get a plan of operations in place, or they can appeal our decision that they are not in compliance. Based on what the issues were, they have two routes that they can go, depending on which issue it is. They can either appeal to the state director of the Bureau of Land Management here in Oregon and Washington, or they can appeal to the Interior Board of Appeals. In informal discussion with their lawyer, it sounds like they’re going to appeal, but they have a few days before they have to let us know.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/showdown-with...XJCxg9q.99

Well, I am sure it will get settled in court. It certainly seems to me that both parties need direction.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
04-15-2015, 07:57 PM #6
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
(04-15-2015, 05:15 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Well, I am sure it will get settled in court. It certainly seems to me that both parties need direction.

BLM needs to be drop-kicked off the Empire State Building. The direction they need is down and crash.
04-15-2015, 08:33 PM #7
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,877 Threads:444 Joined:Jun 2012
(04-15-2015, 07:57 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(04-15-2015, 05:15 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Well, I am sure it will get settled in court. It certainly seems to me that both parties need direction.

BLM needs to be drop-kicked off the Empire State Building. The direction they need is down and crash.

Only if the mining company is operating as per the rules, are they following the rules? That remains to be seen.

"But the BLM says the documents are outdated, and at some point, the property has changed hands which cancels out the grandfather process. Now, the BLM says the miners have to tone down their mining operation to stay in line with the regulations."


I would like to see a plan of operations too! They were asked two years ago to produce it!

“We’ve sent them those letters,” said BLM’s Jim Whittington. “They also have the right to appeal our notice, that it requires either a plan of operation or notice, and some informal contacts with their lawyer…it sounds like they may appeal. So if they appeal, that starts another administrative appeal process.”

Read this: sad2.gif

Are they getting at the gold via acid mining?


11 April 2015

At the request of the Sugar Pine Mining Claim owners, Oath Keepers of Josephine County mission is to ensure the mining claim owners 5th Amendment Constitutional Right to Due Process is not violated by the Bureau of Land Management.

This is NOT a standoff with BLM. We are NOT promoting any confrontation with BLM. This is a security operation for the protection of Constitutional Rights. If you have a different agenda outside of the above peaceful mission statement, we don’t need your assistance. Please DO NOT make any type of threatening phone calls to the local BLM or USFS as it undermines our mission, professionalism and is unwarranted. Thank you.




DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com